Revision of the Playerworld Rules

[Rufus]

I actually really like the current Playerworld Rules, they seem to be sensible and fair, but I don't know the last time they were actually really enforced.

We all know that Graal is short of Playerworld Administration right now, and that might not be such a bad thing in terms of the remaining lack of trust that people have, but in respects to Graal, it is. I know Ibonic was considdering hiring some new Playerworld Admins soon, I remember talking to him about it for a while, I can't remember what he was waiting for though, hmm..

Anyway, what I would personally really like to see more is PWA reviews. I used to always read through Malinko and Spark's reviews in the past, they are a good way of finding an unbiased view of a server (which isn't from a member of staff there), and they're a good introduction for the servers themselves.

One thing that confuses me is that we have the Playerworld rules, but I'm not actually sure what the rules are for Classic and Hosted servers, I've always wondered if they're under the same treatment. I totally agree with Crono, and I'd really like to see the playerlist cleaned up a bit more, if you're starting a new proposal, I think you should try out your new rules on every current Classic and Hosted server, to see if they actually do pass. There are too many servers these days, and like Crono said, quality is better then quantity.

[Mykel]

Originally Posted by Rufus

Anyway, what I would personally really like to see more is PWA reviews.

Agreed. Reading old reviews back in the day by Jinx or Torankusu would motivate me to want to make a server. In-depth details about the server were always entertaining to read.

There was a detailed system that showed if a playerworld passed or failed. There were ratings for different parts of the server. Here is an example. Everyone had a better idea of why the server was put up. It also was a great way to get people interested in the server. I would love to see some sort of rendition of this come back.

[Rufus]

Originally Posted by Mykel

Agreed. Reading old reviews back in the day by Jinx or Torankusu would motivate me to want to make a server. In-depth details about the server were always entertaining to read.

There was a detailed system that showed if a playerworld passed or failed. There were ratings for different parts of the server. Here is an example. Everyone had a better idea of why the server was put up. It also was a great way to get people interested in the server. I would love to see some sort of rendition of this come back.

Yeah, with more images though!

I also wish more posts such as these were made:

http://forums.graal2001.com/forums/s...ad.php?t=55868
http://forums.graal2001.com/forums/s...ad.php?t=56606

I PM'd Stefan a few days before this years Halloween to see if he was going to create one this year, obviously not. Posts like are just a bit of light relief and build more of a community in my opinion. It would be nice if we had more community based posts rather then the constant "EVIL MODERATION!!11!" ones, and the Playerworld Administration could do those.