Zodiac going Classic - Page 5

Rapidwolve · #61 08-20-2006, 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheJames

I laugh at the scripts i have planted in the overworld of Zodiac when I worked there, good thing I dont play Graal or i'd have some fun

xD

HoudiniMan · #62 08-20-2006, 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy0687

what it took to get through ALL The inspections

There's an inspection for Hosted and an inspection for Classic.

You dont even have to be hosted to go classic, although I doubt any world would refuse hosted who was near qualifying for classic.

Some people argue the GST looking over your scripts for security is a separate inspection, okay, so a PWA inspection and a GST inspection...?

Doesn't sound so bad to me.

KuJi · #63 08-20-2006, 03:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HoudiniMan

Some people argue the GST looking over your scripts for security is a separate inspection, okay, so a PWA inspection and a GST inspection...?

I want a GST inspection! :O!

Darkyoshi12345 · #64 08-20-2006, 03:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KuJi

I want a GST inspection! :O!

So does everyone else, haha.

Join the bandwagon!

KuJi · #65 08-20-2006, 04:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darkyoshi12345

So does everyone else, haha.

Join the bandwagon!

But unlike SoG, i'd probally pass

.

And I dont think anyone wants globals to just come here and tell you you cant script - so I choose cheetos

Rapidwolve · #66 08-20-2006, 04:19 AM

Offtopic x.x

PrinceDark · #67 08-22-2006, 03:44 PM

Congrats to Zodiac, though I'm not at all impressed. I'll stick to Maloria since it has the same gameplay, just better gfx. :/

Quote:

Originally Posted by konidias

Best part of Zodiac: the rap radio station. Nothing like hearing Dr Dre singing about glocks and hookers.

For some reason I think this has to be violating some of Graal's rules.

Haha. No doubt.

Crono · #68 08-22-2006, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by konidias

For some reason I think this has to be violating some of Graal's rules.

It's not hosted on the Graal servers. Don't think it's against the rules.

Shotoo2 · #69 08-22-2006, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KuJi

But unlike SoG, i'd probally pass

.

And I dont think anyone wants globals to just come here and tell you you cant script - so I choose cheetos

Beggars can't be choosers.

Sum41Freeeeek · #70 08-23-2006, 04:32 AM

I'm starting to think Zodiac wasn't ready for classic.
I'm a level 36 ninja, and there are no skills left. That means I'm going to wind up leveling
to 50 without getting anything new, it's stupid.

Other classes like summoner and paladin have ONE skill.

_Z3phyr_ · #71 08-23-2006, 04:43 AM

I'm a level 37 Mage and I still have some things to get but I chose not to get them because I was smart enough to realize that once I got high enough in level I wouldn't have much to do. Everything in moderation, I say.

Then again if you're above level 35 at all by now chances are you've been playing constantly since the server was released, so rest assured that the staff didn't expect you to level up so damn fast and then bitch about nothing to do because you nerded your way to the top.

They've still gotta work out their kinks and it obviously wasn't easy to make what they have now so get off their asses about not having anything to do/new when you're near the highest level available because you've spent the past 3-4 days constantly killing shit and enjoy what they have to offer for the time being.

Sum41Freeeeek · #72 08-23-2006, 04:53 AM

That's no excuse.
When going classic, "what we're working on is.." shouldn't be taken in to concern while
being inspected.
Also, it did not take "nerding" to level up so fast, some of my friends say when they join
parties they go from 1 - 20 in like, 2 hours. That's no where near "nerding"

So yeah, my point is, is that they should of had much more done before going classic.

Yen · #73 08-23-2006, 07:16 AM

Well, first of all.. If we're holding a 200+ playercount, we have to be doing something right.
Honestly, Zodiac will never be complete. We're bringing out updates every day, which in my mind is why we have such a high playercount.

I agree, there was a problem with leveling that was overlooked. A certain staff member screwed up a lot of baddy archetypes, which resulted in baddies that were level 30, 40, and 50 having the stats of baddies levels 10 and 20. We fixed it as fast as possible, but the damage is already done. Nothing can be done to help it.

Rapidwolve · #74 08-23-2006, 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yen

Well, first of all.. If we're holding a 200+ playercount, we have to be doing something right.
Honestly, Zodiac will never be complete. We're bringing out updates every day, which in my mind is why we have such a high playercount.

I agree, there was a problem with leveling that was overlooked. A certain staff member screwed up a lot of baddy archetypes, which resulted in baddies that were level 30, 40, and 50 having the stats of baddies levels 10 and 20. We fixed it as fast as possible, but the damage is already done. Nothing can be done to help it.

You tell em yen

konidias · #75 08-23-2006, 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yen

Well, first of all.. If we're holding a 200+ playercount, we have to be doing something right.
Honestly, Zodiac will never be complete. We're bringing out updates every day, which in my mind is why we have such a high playercount.

I agree, there was a problem with leveling that was overlooked. A certain staff member screwed up a lot of baddy archetypes, which resulted in baddies that were level 30, 40, and 50 having the stats of baddies levels 10 and 20. We fixed it as fast as possible, but the damage is already done. Nothing can be done to help it.

It hasn't even been a full week. It's easy to hold people's interest for a while... but it's where your playercount stands after a month that shows the real validity. So no need to go bragging just yet. I mean, Zodiac is still fresh and new... for now.

Did you level down the people who got to such high levels through the bug/glitch/staff mistake?