Your age!

[Mykel]

Originally Posted by Googi

Even if you got an 18+ forum, what would be the point? You could talk about alcohol? There's not much we've ever talked about on that subject anyways. The real freedom you (and I) want is to be able to criticize the rules, administration, staff, etc, and we won't get that simply from some age-restricted forum.

Agreed.

Someday the people who run this forum will actually realize that when people criticize them, it doesn't have to be a bad thing. Let people debate over the rules. What is the harm in that?

Have you ever heard of the term "the customer comes first"? You are supposed to listen to what we complain about, not dismiss it as us being disturbances. You are supposed to run this game like professionals. And the forums are no different than the game.

Also, I'd be willing to bet that if you treated us with a little bit of respect, it would be returned. Kaimetsu ran the forums for years, while deleting posts, banning members, and doing all the other supermod duties. However, he is seen in great respect, because he heard people out and let them have their complaints.

What is so hard about that?

I realize that people are going to be immature about things. People are going to say stupid things and take it too far. But as the leaders of the forum, it is foolish to alienate the rest of your clients just because a few people are fools.

[Zero Hour]

Originally Posted by Mykel

You are supposed to run this game like professionals.

Your idea of Profressionalism, and real-life professionalism are two very different things.

Although I won't say you're too far from the mark

[Mykel]

Originally Posted by Zero Hour

Your idea of Profressionalism, and real-life professionalism are two very different things.

Although I won't say you're too far from the mark

So, you would say that the professionalism [or lack thereof] shown by Graal Online administration is equal to that of the norm of real-life professionalism?

[Zero Hour]

Originally Posted by Mykel

So, you would say that the professionalism [or lack thereof] shown by Graal Online administration is equal to that of the norm of real-life professionalism?

Honestly, I would.

[Sam]

Originally Posted by Mykel

Someday the people who run this forum will actually realize that when people criticize them, it doesn't have to be a bad thing. Let people debate over the rules. What is the harm in that?

If criticism is sticking to facts and not becoming personal, it's permitted. But sadly, debates are often ending in insulting.

[Sam]

I posted off topic too. That is in the nature of things and happens all days but is not okay, right. I don't think we should make a rule to prohibit it generally.

It's better to stop this discussion now. Further contributions wouldn't be really helpful delve into the topic.