Why are inactive playerworlds on classic list? - Page 5

Lyndzey · #61 06-29-2006, 02:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mogwai

To say this decision was not made by this thread is kind of... well off. Ironically half of the mentioned playerworlds were contacted about this and removed within that day.

I guess I didn't explain myself clearly. I meant that this decision was not made by Crono. It was made by a member of PWA with Konidias (Bomy Lands) and a member of PWA with Loakey (SL). Sorry for the confusion.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mogwai

If Loakey would of said no to the agreement would it still be on the classic list?

Answer: No

Wrong answer.

We wanted to do what was best for this server. If Loakey wanted SL to stay on the Classic tab, he would have gotten his wish. I was told that SL was being re-made, and so Loakey was perfectly fine with SL being moved to the invisible list, or "underconstruction" list.

I think Loakey is upset with people insulting SL in this thread, not with the decision. He was a part of that decision because he is the manager of the server.

I will say this one more time. The PWA did contact both managers of the two playerworlds that were removed. The PWA were unaware that James was still manager based on the fact that he was no longer in server options, so they felt that Loakey had the power to make the decision.

If Loakey wishes for SL to go back on the serverlist, he can contact one of the PWA and talk it out with them.

Crono · #62 06-29-2006, 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mogwai

If you just read the main part of the topic as James states it was opinion based. Cronos even included "according to me" and in no way even knew further details towards the playerworlds. This is Crono's opinion... and why should a simple players opinion reflect on getting the playerworld removed.

I'm not a simple player, I'm Crono the mighty. I have enough say to shutdown playerworlds now bow down son.

Quote:

As James said, he understands why it was removed... but why now? Why not a month ago? 3 months ago? Why ironically when someone claims a server is inactive without further proof it was removed WITHIN A DAY. Why didn't the PWA take the approach to see what the playerworld was currently doing. What if SL was planning on releasing the new content in a few days? There are so many questions that WERENT asked and someone just took the initiative to just removing it to make a few people happy.

Why later?

Proof? Wtf, just look at it's playerbase population, no one gives a **** if you're developing 1000 things, it's a classic server with 0 players. What the hell?

Quote:

Once again you are being irrelevant and just riding Crono's ass for points.

You're just jealous no one listens to you. Stop crying, please.

Quote:

LAWL,when it was re-re-opend silly

I said -stable-.

Mogwai · #63 06-29-2006, 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerami

You're just jealous no one listens to you. Stop crying, please.

God that was so incredibly lame.

Thallen · #64 06-29-2006, 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eagle

Just wondering, who was contacted regarding Bomy Lands?

There's no rule that says someone has to be contacted before a playerworld is taken off the list. You act like Bomy Lands, or Shaded Legend for that matter, never thought 'hey, no one plays this server, we might eventually get shut down.'

Removing both playerworlds from the list was a smart thing.

Crono · #65 06-29-2006, 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mogwai

God that was so incredibly lame.

Like most of your crying.

Mogwai · #66 06-29-2006, 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerami

Like most of your crying.

That wasn't even clever.

Crono · #67 06-29-2006, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mogwai

That wasn't even clever.

Neither are you.

Loakey_P2P · #68 06-29-2006, 03:52 PM

ok there is aparentlly still alot of confusion about this . i came on aol one afternoon to check some e-mail and what not with what little time i had . i was imediatlly imed about a global there to remove the server . so i had to switch computer's and get on rc . i dont know what everone think's but the pwa's dont show up for idle conversation . they come for a reason , we discussed seval issue's about the server and discussed our plan's .

by the end of the conversation we were both at agreement that the best thing was to take sl off classic untill it was repaired . james was not contacted as i removed him a day or two prior to this due to not being able to contact him . let me make this clear also . when contego left , hrr4 was head manager . there were of course three of us listed as management due to lack of time by everyone and so much to be done we figured we could do more with more people on various project's .

when contego left i convinced james to come back at the cost of matrix's involvement (i fired matrix to get james back for the non-thinker's) . when week's started passing and i never heard from james . no return e-mail , forum pm , or any other way . so i removed him and start pushing forward without any help from the old sl staff as they couldnt even give me idea's or old plan's that wernt done . im really surprised to hear that there is one person that actually likes the story line . most player's didnt .

as for the private part , no one mind's that sl was put back in dev stage . it's really the best thing for it , i believe that if this last release dont do it sl may be lost for good , however were not done yet . we are not mad about the server being moved , what bother's us is how much people talk about the problem's in sl and does nothing to help resolve them . anyone can sit back and complain but hardlly anyone is willing to step up and try their best to help us fix them .

but also player's need to think about how they present this as it can also infureate the staff if not brought in the right format . i am one of the few sl staff that is really open minded enought to listen to player's opion's and take them seriouslly . but they cant be brought to my attention as hey this work's for this server everyone loves it , do it now . i was talking on our forum's about this the other day . you can only bring up the playercount so many times before it get's old .

we are perfectlly aware of the player count as it has not changed since benpokes time . actually it went down and stayed down ever since then . but in order to keep player's on the server as much as possable we need alot of thing's for them to do , and untill we get alot rebuilt , or the whole server completed this is not gona happen . just please be calm and pacient while we try to get this stuff to you the player's . we will most likelly make a big announcement via graalonline about when the big day will be . but untill then were up to our neck's in alot of stuff that need's to be redone .

ApothiX · #69 06-29-2006, 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mogwai

Your post was just claiming that SL was inactive. You even included "HIGHLY" to exaggerate your 'point'. Yet you don't play SL at all and don't know what is going on. As for bringing it to the attention of the PWA... what do they do all day? Sit around Graal and not notice the 0 playercount on a regular bases? It's been KNOWN FOR A WHILE by the PWA of the current situation of SL. As for Vulcan (previously guild admin if not still), he is the newest PWA therefor doesn't know all the information about SL. James is more concerned on how acts were taken in a unprofessional way and even stated here...

Once again you are being irrelevant and just riding Crono's ass for points. F8 does not show what the current community is doing to SL. F8 just shows a simple number. F8 doesn't show why the playerworld has such a low playercount. You can claim it to be the players are not interested, but after having globals come on and screw with your NPC Server as a joke and resetting the whole economy script and getting away with it (2 globals did this) it's not just because players werent interested. You are simply a player who has eyes and just notices that number associated on the F8 menu, in no way does that have anything to do with what James was saying.

Enlighten me, Oh great Buddah. Why does it have such a low playercount, if the reason is not because it utterly blows?

Crono · #70 07-04-2006, 05:22 PM

Anywho, about Delteria.

Most of the time it sits there collecting dust, with a wooping playercount of 0-5. Sometimes it may get a touch from god and boost up to 10-15 but thats about it. It's developing as a dev server anyway.

irule13 · #71 07-04-2006, 06:07 PM

i didnt read the whole thread but, shaded legend should be put under new management, i think it could be a good server if they had active staff updating it, but every time i have gone on there was never a single staff on.

kenyonandelliot · #72 07-07-2006, 01:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irule13

shaded legend should be put under new management, i think it could be a good server if they had active staff updating it, but every time i have gone on there was never a single staff on.

Shaded Legend is active, and it is a good server. You don't see any staff on because they're working on a Dev Server.

Quote:

Originally Posted by irule13

i didnt read the whole thread

I can see that.