Soon after Icarus is complete.... - Page 2

petro1212 · #16 02-27-2006, 01:10 PM

In my opinion everyone that makes a post longer than 500 words is so full of him/her self. We all know graal management sucks and yes you have the right to point it out but people forget that graal is the property of Stefan and Unix.. They don't have to do anything aslong as it is a profitable product for them.

Above that, calling the entire global "staff" unfit is rather lame. It's easy to blame people for their mistakes withouth running a mile in their shoe's.

But thats all the time I'm going to waste posting/reading since this thread has a lifespan of about *thinks* 5 hours till Moonie will shut it down.

PS: I don't think anyone actualy cares for the server named Icarus.. nor do they care for most of the UC servers. People mainly play this "game/platform" form the community and not for the sometimes unspeakably horrible content that is located on the UC servers. (Ok UN isn't a picture either.. but they already got their community... so they don't have to care)

SilentOne1988 · #17 02-27-2006, 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petro1212

In my opinion everyone that makes a post longer than 500 words is so full of him/her self. We all know graal management sucks and yes you have the right to point it out but people forget that graal is the property of Stefan and Unix.. They don't have to do anything aslong as it is a profitable product for them.

Above that, calling the entire global "staff" unfit is rather lame. It's easy to blame people for their mistakes withouth running a mile in their shoe's.

But thats all the time I'm going to waste posting/reading since this thread has a lifespan of about *thinks* 5 hours till Moonie will shut it down.

PS: I don't think anyone actualy cares for the server named Icarus.. nor do they care for most of the UC servers. People mainly play this "game/platform" form the community and not for the sometimes unspeakably horrible content that is located on the UC servers. (Ok UN isn't a picture either.. but they already got their community... so they don't have to care)

I agree, you are right, there are some competent global staff, but there arent many. The only I see online are Malinko, Growlz, CheeTos, Bjorn, and Lance. Bjorn, Lance, Growlz, and CheeTos are awesome.

You don't think anything in this thread is true though?

Edit:

I never said Malinko was a bad guy Damix, I simply said that Bjorn, Lance, Growlz, and Cheetos are awesome, I guess what i'm complaining about is the forum staff.

Damix2 · #18 02-27-2006, 09:37 PM

So you've created a thread to bash one member - Malinko, this can be done in PMs, if you have issues then contact graal management.

There is really no point to this thread other then to sound like a "smart" person.

Zero Hour · #19 02-27-2006, 10:52 PM

I'm not a fan of people who go about complaining in this manner. If you don't think Graal Online is being run properly create a support ticket highlighting the weak points. If there is no response, and you find no change - leave.

I would also like to remind you that Stefan doesn't really run Graal. He makes lots of [big] decisions, but he doesn't really run it. He's also human. Graal is also a business.

Tom · #20 02-28-2006, 12:37 AM

Well, i have to agree quite alot with Silent here, it does actually make sense, and majority that may disagree are those trying to suck up. I really hope someone reads this post and changes graal.

Zero Hour · #21 02-28-2006, 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom

I really hope someone reads this post and changes graal.

Someone is pretty vague, but I can promise you those who can change graal all read the support center.

Maybe he should take his complaints there, in a formal manner mind you

TedHead2k · #22 02-28-2006, 05:41 AM

I'd just like to say... I agree with the original post wholeheartedly.

And you guys all sound like major nerds when you pick apart each others posts and try to make witty comebacks to each other. Grow up, learn some real conflict resolution skills and constructively deal with a problem at hand instead of trying to make each other look stupid with unjustifiable remarks.

Andy0687 · #23 02-28-2006, 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zero Hour

If you don't think Graal Online is being run properly create a support ticket highlighting the weak points. If there is no response, and you find no change - leave.

Graal online is a nonrefundable service, why would they just give up and waste their money further then they have ;/ i really dont understand.

If support tickets are ignored, and you go without being heard, then no one may know how you think, even though they think alike.

lancelot9 · #24 03-01-2006, 01:03 AM

Well... all your guys are just jelouse of Icarus because all the staff there own.
And as of now my Easymac is too hot to eat.

TheJames · #25 03-01-2006, 01:07 AM

Long live the Republic!

lancelot9 · #26 03-01-2006, 01:09 AM

I am also a peacawk.

SilentOne1988 · #27 03-01-2006, 01:24 AM

Lance, stop being an idiot.

In response to your post below this:
I believe that players should be able to pitch a server idea, maybe hand Stefan a design doc, and if Stefan likes, he can give them a free server. If players just want a server to screw around on, that has no real purpose, or not enough talent or good enough idea, then make them pay.

lancelot9 · #28 03-01-2006, 04:00 AM

Ok, no really... my opinion:
Graal is a rip off. Reasons:
1) It's addicting and it takes life away from many who do not have the strength to pretend it doesn't exsist.
2)Staff usually don't get paid... which is retarted because staff are the ones who keep the game going right? Without staff what would players buy gold or VIP for? Yeah... so like i think anyway that staff should get paid instead of paying to attract more players.
3) Its addicting
4) It is addicting
5) The better you do with something the more people disslike you.