Another of these...

[D4rKv310c1ty]

Originally Posted by petro1212

The only real problem with graal is advertisement. I'v seen graal advertise on some websites (for free.. I think) like advertisements done by Stefan/Unixmad. Graal should try to promite itself like an online gamemaker/rpg maker program. It would attract alot of people since there is a big market in this area.

If graal promoted itself like this for both 2d & 3d games than I think that there will be enough room for new games to come out trough graal (Check Thym's post in Future Improvement)

Graal as a gamedev software (wich it is.. now), not as a dumb zelda clone.

So you think Graal should release its source?

Hmm, that could make a big downfall in their profits.

[Lord Sephiroth]

Originally Posted by Thallen

I'd rather see Babylon released once again more than I would like to see Graal 3D be released, and Babylon will probably be more successful.

We're working on it!

Our staff team is getting more and more distinguished and i'm pleased to say that Babylon recently had 129 players online as a PRIVATE playerworld!
I fully expect Malinko will have the server prepped and ready for re-release soon.

[Andy0687]

Originally Posted by Lord Sephiroth

Our staff team is getting more and more distinguished and i'm pleased to say that Babylon recently had 129 players online as a PRIVATE playerworld!
I fully expect Malinko will have the server prepped and ready for re-release soon.

Babylon is still a Classic playerworld just hidden from the Classic list

when only Gold/Vip players can log on then it is considered a "Private" playerworld

[CidNight1142]

Originally Posted by GoZelda

Graal 3D is pointless, if someone wants a 3D RPG they can get a professional one like WoW for some money, or a free one like Rubies of Eventide. Graal's no competition compared to those, and if it decides to change direction to shooter there are far better 2D (Soldat) and 3D (Maiet GunZ), free shooter games. The only terrain Graal has a huge headstart is player development.

I agree, we should probably stick with what we're good at.

[TedHead2k]

I agree with the original posting rant entirely. It's exactly how I feel.

Also, I liked Graal as a "dumb zelda clone" and I really don't enjoy the servers that try to make their own RPG systems and everything. To be totally blunt, I want a Zelda game filled with tons of quests and storyline that is online and multiplayer. But that goal seems to be void from all the developer's heads now

[Prozac]

As for advertizing, there are incentive plans on graal.net for pw owners, to earn like at least 2 bucks or credit twoards their pw rental, if someone buys an account from your link.

But, I mean, can I just like make up a screenshot graphic, or are there pre-approved graphics that they want us to use, if we go buy an ad on a website to get people to buy graal accounts, and we get a kickback percentage if they use our referral link?

[Inverness]

Graal must get more players.
Advertisement

[pacMASTA]

We need a donation jar, and maybe graalonline can buy some banners out, then make a professional commerical that advertises a free month on graal online classic status.

[protagonist]

Originally Posted by pacMASTA

We need a donation jar, and maybe graalonline can buy some banners out, then make a professional commerical that advertises a free month on graal online classic status.

People only donate when they aren't already putting out about $30-$50 a year for an account. And it's doubtful that donations would even approach what they make now, so a replacement isn't very viable.


Certainly, before advertisement takes place, there has to be overall improvement on Graal's playabilities.