Massokre's Classic Discussion (split from Warning about graalians.com)

[Tyhm]

Stormy - let him have his fun. Worst case scenario, he makes some oldbies happy and they stop bothering us. Best case scenario, he's got it out of his system, it's a win-win. Clearly Extant Classic isn't as concerned about its roots as some of the more die hard conservatives insist it should be.

[syltburk]

Originally Posted by Tyhm

Stormy - let him have his fun. Worst case scenario, he makes some oldbies happy and they stop bothering us. Best case scenario, he's got it out of his system, it's a win-win. Clearly Extant Classic isn't as concerned about its roots as some of the more die hard conservatives insist it should be.

There would be no worst case scenario because its based on trust, raistlin (yoimbokintoray) are not the one I would like to see as manager.

I would like MS to stay, but I want massokre gone

[maximus_asinus]

Originally Posted by syltburk

I would like MS to stay, but I want massokre gone

What exactly did Massokre do? (lets keep in mind that he was only made LAT Admin in September).

[Polo]

Originally Posted by Tyhm

Stormy - let him have his fun. Worst case scenario, he makes some oldbies happy and they stop bothering us. Best case scenario, he's got it out of his system, it's a win-win. Clearly Extant Classic isn't as concerned about its roots as some of the more die hard conservatives insist it should be.

The problem is that when you have 2 servers sharing a core level set, you effectively tear the community and playercount in half, and then both servers find it even harder to survive.

[Luda]

the mountain up top of the current overworld seems too straight
I say shape it around a bit

[Minoc]

Originally Posted by Polo

The problem is that when you have 2 servers sharing a core level set, you effectively tear the community and playercount in half, and then both servers find it even harder to survive.

The community had already been teared.

[iownu]

Originally Posted by Polo

The problem is that when you have 2 servers sharing a core level set, you effectively tear the community and playercount in half, and then both servers find it even harder to survive.

Which is why the idea of a competition works well.

Whoever can produce the better server, that most accurately reflects the name "Classic" by let's say, april or may, gets the spot.

PWA, Stefan, the players, or all of the above can judge the two.

You've had pleanty of time to have something out that is much better than this.

If you think you're doing the best job possible, or even a good job, you wouldnt have any reason to not agree to this.

[Polo]

Originally Posted by iownu

If you think you're doing the best job possible, or even a good job, you wouldnt have any reason to not agree to this.

That, in my opinion is incorrect. There are countless examples in real life where rivalry has led the consumer to select neither, opting for the so-called third option.

[Inspiration]

Originally Posted by Polo

That, in my opinion is incorrect. There are countless examples in real life where rivalry has led the consumer to select neither, opting for the so-called third option.

What is stopping the comsumer from selecting something else right now? Nothing. In fact, most people are.

What I'm saying, flat out, is I can make a better "Classic" than you in much less time than you've had, that a larger majority of players will enjoy.

It won't be perfect, and not everyone will enjoy it, but it won't be a butchered server that resembles classic in no way besides a few levels like the current one is.

If you think we're wrong, allow us access to the content and allow us the chance to do so. If we fall, you gain proof that no one can do better than you are. If we don't, everyone gains a better server.