Updates? - Page 6

protagonist · #76 07-26-2005, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by konidias

When you come up with an idea that you think is good and then people flat out reject it without even giving it a chance... it doesn't make you want to be very open to what THEY have to say.

Well, as a manager you have to accept that people will do that, and also be able to take it without looking like you're agitated. Aesthetics are what make a server.

Quote:

Originally Posted by konidias

I really don't thing arguing about it is going to matter right now. I shouldn't have said anything at all. When it is released you can either play it or not play it.

That's not a good attitude to have. You want people to play the server and help make it a success, not get mad at you because you're impatient with their concerns.

Quote:

Originally Posted by konidias

I'm just kind of tired of people claiming I'm being egotistical or selfish because I refuse to work with Lance. I don't want to work with him, it would not be fun and I would not enjoy it, therefore I don't do it. I'm already investing my time and effort into this project, I'm sure as heck not going to do it if I'm not enjoying it.

I think it's a good idea for you not to work with Lance. I agree that people should stop pressing for something that is so obviously a stupid idea.

Curt1zzle · #77 07-26-2005, 11:04 PM

Hey uhm...call me old fashioned...but shouldn't we complete one playerworld at a time?

Au revoir, Oasis.

Thrashsoul3 · #78 07-29-2005, 12:38 AM

Gscript him up a complex monster system and there ya go!

xAndrewx · #79 07-31-2005, 03:24 PM

screenshots please.

Zurkiba · #80 07-31-2005, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xAndrewx

screenshots please.

Trust me, you'd rather like the surprise of opening day

xAndrewx · #81 08-01-2005, 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zurkiba

Trust me, you'd rather like the surprise of opening day

Who's version? Lance or Koni?

Genesis · #82 09-30-2005, 05:19 PM

I'm for Koni... I just dont think Lance can bring back graal2001
I believe with a new tileset new players will be attracted to it and even
tho everybodys want it to go back to the way it used to be it cant happen
a lot of the old players are gone and were just going to have to have a new
community mixed with the past and the new.

Googi · #83 10-06-2005, 03:25 AM

Slacking off and releasing everything really late is the 2K1 way.

protagonist · #84 10-06-2005, 04:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Googi

Slacking off and releasing everything really late is the 2K1 way.

It is also the "oh no, you're fired" way. But that's not really the Graalian way. It is almost as if there is more integrity in playerworlds than in the official servers.

James205 · #85 10-06-2005, 06:36 PM

I think it's quite obvious that the thought of g2k1 coming back is unreal. I lost interest in the whole project to bring it back because it wont be the same and it will be just plain out lame.

It's better to just let it go or give it up to someone who will actually push it and be released on time, but at this rate it's never going to be released and people will just lose interest. Using the excuse "We are developing just fine" and "Just wait and see" is no proof of developing at all, it just seems like some lame excuse so people will leave them alone... it wont stop until we get some kind of proof.

In my opinion, I don't think Graal2001 will go anywhere... but that's just my opinion.

xAndrewx · #86 10-06-2005, 06:44 PM

I agree, it's not worth it. Nothing new is going to come from 2K1, where alot of new stuff from Bomy Moon...

Zxion · #87 10-06-2005, 10:48 PM

I did see Lance on Graal2001 dev last night but I forgot to take a picture :/ But I mean, why would I lie?

Amagius · #88 10-07-2005, 04:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James205

I think it's quite obvious that the thought of g2k1 coming back is unreal. I lost interest in the whole project to bring it back because it wont be the same and it will be just plain out lame.

It's better to just let it go or give it up to someone who will actually push it and be released on time, but at this rate it's never going to be released and people will just lose interest. Using the excuse "We are developing just fine" and "Just wait and see" is no proof of developing at all, it just seems like some lame excuse so people will leave them alone... it wont stop until we get some kind of proof.

In my opinion, I don't think Graal2001 will go anywhere... but that's just my opinion.

I held my optimism for as long as possible, but I'm finally going to be realistic and admit it: Graal 2001 is a memory, and trying to reenact it can never actually be done. I have a social life now -- my life doesn't revolve around the computer, and spending time on Graal 2001 rather than other activities is fallacious. (atleast in my case)

Mykel · #89 10-07-2005, 07:45 AM

I remember a few months ago when G2K1 came back, and it was on the classic list, and it had a decent playerbase. That would have been the best time for everything to be done.

We'll see.

Any news from the Koni side?

protagonist · #90 10-07-2005, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zxion

I did see Lance on Graal2001 dev last night but I forgot to take a picture :/ But I mean, why would I lie?

I wonder what he wasn't doing. I bet something to do with 2k1's release.