Say what, Lance?

zim5354 · #1 08-26-2005, 01:48 AM

npc kings have there uses...say king "x" invites one of his friends to the kingdom and gives him a really high ranking position becuse they hang out on another server even though he can not rp then billy bob has been in the kingdom longer and has better rping skills then the kings friend with npc kings it would stay fair and non currupt from a cirten view point.

::edit:: with my one post a day i hope someone will tell lance my reply is on this page...

Ok for king X i will use bela ophi or whatever it is as a example I dont play graal kingdoms and I can already tell thats improper rping from my time on val..How come its still there when its incorrect and should have been removed by the kingdoms manager things need to be done but they always arnt sure king X should be removed but he hasnt just like bela whatever

Lance · #2 08-26-2005, 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zim5354

npc kings have there uses...say king "x" invites one of his friends to the kingdom and gives him a really high ranking position becuse they hang out on another server even though he can not rp then billy bob has been in the kingdom longer and has better rping skills then the kings friend with npc kings it would stay fair and non currupt from a cirten view point.

King X is a bad king and should've been removed by the Kingdoms Admin or Manager. Why was King X not removed?

konidias · #3 08-26-2005, 01:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lance

King X is a bad king and should've been removed by the Kingdoms Admin or Manager. Why was King X not removed?

Because in a realistic situation, it would be difficult and/or time consuming to watch and judge both players and test their roleplaying abilities. Something the manager would not have time to do. Something the Kingdoms Admin would not rank as a major priority.

If the Kingdom Admin or Manager is removing kings because someone claims the king is showing favoritism, you're going to run out of kings pretty fast.

Zurkiba · #4 08-26-2005, 02:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by konidias

Because in a realistic situation, it would be difficult and/or time consuming to watch and judge both players and test their roleplaying abilities. Something the manager would not have time to do. Something the Kingdoms Admin would not rank as a major priority.

If the Kingdom Admin or Manager is removing kings because someone claims the king is showing favoritism, you're going to run out of kings pretty fast.

Trust me - proving if a person can roleplay properly or not takes about three seconds.

protagonist · #5 08-26-2005, 03:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zurkiba

Trust me - proving if a person can roleplay properly or not takes about three seconds.

Why are there so many bad roleplayers in GK? There are human kings there, and it's absolutely atrocious. Having human kings doesn't seem to influence roleplaying suckiness.

Zurkiba · #6 08-26-2005, 03:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by protagonist

Why are there so many bad roleplayers in GK? There are human kings there, and it's absolutely atrocious. Having human kings doesn't seem to influence roleplaying suckiness.

No Kingdoms Admin - which 2k1 has a very good one at that.

protagonist · #7 08-26-2005, 03:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zurkiba

No Kingdoms Admin - which 2k1 has a very good one at that.

How is a Kingdoms Admin going to know every little problem that goes on? I don't see how a Kingdoms Admin is going to fix bad roleplaying when the majority of the players don't roleplay well, or don't care to.