Roleplaying Admin

[Discharge]

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

Why do you make inexperience a factor? If we are able to judge a person's qualifications then we should simply give the job to whoever scores highest.

Well here is the thing, we have been giving the same people staff positions and Graal Kingdoms is not looking to good as far as role-playing goes. We have these GK staff folks making bogus items such as the “Mail of Might.” If we allow someone out of this circle of people then there is a good chance for somebody to improve the role-playing atmosphere. Chris is a staff member already but they still want to nominate him for another staff position. Let him focus on forest, while another person who doesn’t have any other staff obligations to focus on the role-playing. There can possibly be a real good administrator out there that we won’t find out unless we allow some other folks who have never had the opportunity.

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

"Cause problems"? I am discussing this topic just as anybody else here. The only major difference between your conduct and mine is that you're throwing insults without provocation, while I'm merely arguing the pertinent on-topic points.

Your not, you are mostly arguing with me about my reasons for becoming a Role-playing Administrator rather then listing other prospective RP Administrators and listing the reasons why they would be a good role-playing administrator. I really don’t know why you are so concerned when you don’t role-playing in Kingdoms. (I don’t care about your reasons for not role-playing)

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

Only two people so far have agreed with your self-recommendation. If we're really gonna treat this thing as a popularity contest then those votes might count for something, but not until you poll for opinions on the other candidates.
In an indirect fashion, yes. But such a claim doesn't help your case until you show that the someone is you.

It’s not about popularity contest; I was using those two to show my evidence as a good role-player. Of course you wouldn’t know that I’m a good role-player because you’re not currently in the role-playing community. If you ever did role-play then it must have been something you did every once in awhile. My evidence is not sufficient for you because you don’t role-play in Graal Kingdoms and I really don’t remember seeing you role-play in Graal2001. I don’t need to provide any more extensive evidence for my qualification besides my reputation in the role-playing community. You see, those who are involved in role-playing know me. As a result, my reputation is sufficient enough to provide evidence of a qualified person to be a role-playing administrator.

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

Then why did I choose your post instead of somebody else's?

I’m not you; I don’t know why you picked me or picked any other person from other threads to argue with.

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

Hahaha. It's always fun to see hypocritical peacemongers in action. If you wanted the argument to stop, why did you make a post perpetuating it?

Ha-ha, real funny, I’m laughing my ass off too.

It’s just my natural reaction in response to someone who wishes to contend with me. However, I don’t enjoy prolonging an argument because they are very time consuming. I know for you it’s something of a mental sport which you take part in pleasure. However, since you want to drag it on so be it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Where is Vermin?

[Kaimetsu]

Originally Posted by Discharge

we have been giving the same people staff positions and Graal Kingdoms is not looking to good as far as role-playing goes
If we allow someone out of this circle of people then there is a good chance for somebody to improve the role-playing atmosphere

Why, because the majority of people make good roleplaying admin candidates? You're assuming that we have some means for evaluating a person's competence and reliability, and if do then we can already eliminate the bad apples. If we don't, how do we know that the new person won't be a hundred times worse?

There can possibly be a real good administrator out there that we won’t find out unless we allow some other folks who have never had the opportunity

So now you're saying it's impossible to know how good somebody will be until they've been given the "goodies"?

Your not, you are mostly arguing with me about my reasons for becoming a Role-playing Administrator

Of the eight paragraphs in my previous post:

3 discussed the general principles of staff selection without any reference to you
2 challenged your claims of suitability
3 addressed the attacks you made on my character

Two out of eight doesn't seem to qualify as "mostly".

In any case, if your self-nomination was on-topic then so are my comments thereon.

I really don’t know why you are so concerned when you don’t role-playing in Kingdoms

I may not play Kingdoms, but I do want to see Graal prosper. Weak administrators don't much help that goal.

It's not about popularity contest; I was using those two to show my evidence as a good role-player

So the only reason somebody could vote for you is that you're a good roleplayer? And if somebody else got more votes, it would be logical to assume that they're better?

Of course you wouldn't know that I’m a good role-player because you’re not currently in the role-playing community

My personal experience is pretty much irrelevant here. I merely asked if you could present any substantial evidence for your claim, and it seems that you cannot.

I'm not you; I don’t know why you picked me or picked any other person from other threads to argue with

And yet you seem perfectly comfortable in telling me my reasons for posting here. One moment you can read my mind, the next you can't?

It’s just my natural reaction in response to someone who wishes to contend with me

Congratulations on your lack of self-control. It must be a fantastic trait for an administrator to possess.