A Time for Change

[falco10291029]

no i didnt, 5 times in a row would be 1 after another and such, its 1 post go back to preschool

[GoZelda]

Originally Posted by falco10291029

no i didnt, 5 times in a row would be 1 after another and such, its 1 post go back to preschool

Here, look at this. A bit odd due to saving.

[busyrobot]

Originally Posted by GoZelda

Here, look at this. A bit odd due to saving.

You are viewing the thread in the tree view mode, if you view it by time of post you'll see how it should read.


You are mislead by the fact that people often hit 'reply' or quote to a post part way instead of at the end. For those of us who view it in 'by date' mode it reads in proper order without 5 grouped replies.

[GoZelda]

Originally Posted by busyrobot

You are viewing the thread in the tree view mode, if you view it by time of post you'll see how it should read.


You are mislead by the fact that people often hit 'reply' or quote to a post part way instead of at the end. For those of us who view it in 'by date' mode it reads in proper order without 5 grouped replies.

Even still, he's the only one with whom it looks like that. There should be a rule against it =(

[darkemporor]

Originally Posted by GoZelda

Even still, he's the only one with whom it looks like that. There should be a rule against it =(

Oh please, no more rules! How silly, the posts on this page were made like...

falco, nappa, falco, protagonist, busyrobot, falco, gozelda, busyrobot, monkeyboy mcgee, falco, gozelda, falco, gozelda, busyrobot, gozelda...all sensibly ordered responses...

Falco did one more post than you, but it's a flaw in the tree mode display which has nothing to do with the way a user posts, so Im not sure how it could even be avoided.

Wren

[GoZelda]

Originally Posted by darkemporor

Falco did one more post than you, but it's a flaw in the tree mode display which has nothing to do with the way a user posts, so Im not sure how it could even be avoided.

Eh it does have something to do with the way the user posts.

ummm, I don't think he even realized he was doing it, if you took the time to check the dates of the post you'd see the chronology was staggered with the other posts in the thread.

Well no, because the time span in between was at most one hour, enough time for someone to think 'uhm I'm bored. *posts*'. One hour later:'still bored. *posts*'. And because there was no reference or anything at all, I thought he was just spamming.

[darkemporor]

Originally Posted by GoZelda

Eh it does have something to do with the way the user posts.


Well no, because the time span in between was at most one hour, enough time for someone to think 'uhm I'm bored. *posts*'. One hour later:'still bored. *posts*'. And because there was no reference or anything at all, I thought he was just spamming.

Not really.

Falco's last 4 posts:

Yesterday, 05:18 PM
Yesterday, 09:06 PM
Today, 11:59 AM
Today, 01:00 PM

All of them exceed three hours apart save one. Nothing wrong with his posting habits.

Wren

[busyrobot]

Originally Posted by GoZelda

Even still, he's the only one with whom it looks like that. There should be a rule against it =(

ummm, I don't think he even realized he was doing it, if you took the time to check the dates of the post you'd see the chronology was staggered with the other posts in the thread.