Archaic Laid to Rest

[Kaimetsu]

Originally posted by deman1171
That's stupid, warr with doomsday did

Not legally.

bloo worked his butt of doing all that for Archaic, then he can't take it?

He made it for Archaic. It becomes the property of Archaic. You think professional artists take their graphics when they leave a company?

if i took alot of time for it, then i'm not apart of it, for a reason like this, i would take it

Then you're a very childish person.

[alarid0]

So, it IS a rule of playerworlds...awsome
I thought it was pretty sad when people withdraw all the work they did for a server because they get fired and then take it elsewhere x_X

i guess in some cases i would have to side with the one that did the work

[Spark910]

New World! +_+

[Darlene159]

Originally posted by alarid0
So, it IS a rule of playerworlds...awsome
I thought it was pretty sad when people withdraw all the work they did for a server because they get fired and then take it elsewhere x_X

i guess in some cases i would have to side with the one that did the work

It always has been a rule
X.x

Lol, I just noticed my ban reason for Archaic has changed for the 3rd time...Now it says something about a rule Kai made on the forums? Cant see it all, this is very interesting..What I can read says: "According to Kaimetsu's forum rules, A manager has the right to ban any account(s) of a person or persons....."
thats all I can see. Any ideas Kai?

Anyway, Bloo...your work is amazing, I have always thought that despite everything.

[Python523]

Originally posted by Spark910
New World! +_+

Just how is that relavent to this post?

[DMRenegade]

I had pretty high expectations for Archaic, but since you're dropping out of the project due to those circumstances you mentioned, I'm a little disappointed as this could be a huge blow to the server, either way, it was your choice to make so, good luck in whatever you choose to do now.

[osrs]

Damn, Archaic without Bloo isn't the same

[TifaKhan]

May i just point out, what has happened is possible i believe.
In WarLords case on Doomsday he had an agreement made with a PWA, that the work was his and his only, so when he was fired for his constant abuse towards myself and other staff,he demanded it be deleted.
That of course was the beginning of the end for Doomsday.

I do think, well there was, dont know if there still is, something about agreements made about peoples work.Unless otherwise agreed upon , the work belongs to Graal Online and the server that person works for, but as i said, as an observer who used to Manage a server, thats how it was.

<3Doomsday<3

[Kaimetsu]

Originally posted by Darlene159
Now it says something about a rule Kai made on the forums? Cant see it all, this is very interesting..What I can read says: "According to Kaimetsu's forum rules, A manager has the right to ban any account(s) of a person or persons....."
thats all I can see. Any ideas Kai?

A while ago I posted that it's not unreasonable to ban somebody based on actions outside of Graal, since those actions can reveal the person's character and thus suitability for friendly play. However, I added that such a protocol would only lead to corrupt managers banning for bad reasons, and that I therefore would not support its usage in Graal.

Even if I were supporting it, I have no authority over ingame rules anyway. It would merely be my opinion. It seems that Bloo Kat either misconstrued both my post and my administrative position, or he just wanted another excuse.

*shrugs*

[Spark910]

Originally posted by Python523


Just how is that relavent to this post?

Im comparing the projects.

[Drakmith]

This is mostly to Moon Goddess, if not all of it.

The reason you were banned, was because you had the potentiality to cause future disturbances on Archaic.

If you feel this is an untrue fact, need I remind you that you actively post in the "Blade Falcon" forums.
Some of the thread titles you'll see are "NyT/Tink the Wh*re" and "Bloo the Corrupt."

Now, I don't know about many people here... But I see that as just a slight possibility that you might have logged onto Archaic to cause future problems.

Oh, and on a final note, if Vechlox is so "Bold and Virtuous", then kindly explain why the eagles you see all over his site quite CLEARLY resemble the eagles found on this **** Flag.

http://www.militariacollection.com/i...a%20hitler.gif

[Darlene159]

Originally posted by Drakmith
This is mostly to Moon Goddess, if not all of it.

The reason you were banned, was because you had the potentiality to cause future disturbances on Archaic.

If you feel this is an untrue fact, need I remind you that you actively post in the "Blade Falcon" forums.
Some of the thread titles you'll see are "NyT/Tink the Wh*re" and "Bloo the Corrupt."

Now, I don't know about many people here... But I see that as just a slight possibility that you might have logged onto Archaic to cause future problems.

Oh, and on a final note, if Vechlox is so "Bold and Virtuous", then kindly explain why the eagles you see all over his site quite CLEARLY resemble the eagles found on this **** Flag.

http://www.militariacollection.com/i...a%20hitler.gif

I never harrassed anyone on Archaic, or anywhere...the account was unbanned

Kai...yes, I thought it was from that post, and was misunderstood, but your point was definately proven

[Drakmith]

Originally posted by Darlene159
I never harrassed anyone on Archaic, or anywhere...the account was unbanned

You're avoid the question madam...

Are you, or are you not an active member in the Blade Falcon forums?

[Darlene159]

Originally posted by Drakmith


You're avoid the question madam...

Are you, or are you not an active member in the Blade Falcon forums?

Actually, no I am not an active member, I posted there 2 or 3 times because I was asked for my input, which if you look really didnt say much...I am not responsable for other people's forums, and I did not harrass anyone on those forums, and those forums have nothing to do with graal anyway

[Drakmith]

They aren't related to Graal, yet they serve a high purpose in demuring certain players?

I'm sorry ma'am but that's just full of "it"