New Terms of Service

[DustyPorViva]

Originally Posted by Fulg0reSama

It does matter if you read it, because that's what the intention of the ToS is for, if you're aware of the rules, you are unable to argue against a wrongdoing if you're in violation. If it is a legitimate violation claim, then yes this is perfectly fine, no arguments on it, but what about a false positive, so to speak? If they hadn't read it, they couldn't properly defend, but I think this is just my own opinion based on a hypothetical, so feel free to agree or disagree.

To agree to any terms implies that you have read them, whether or not you did. But I am not a lawyer, so I can't really elaborate on such a thing.

Originally Posted by Fulg0reSama

Warnings are a privilege, I can agree to that. Does that mean they should be entirely disregarded? Because the way I'm reading this, it feels like you are stating it should be.

Hmm? But they're not being entirely disregarded. Simply stating staff have no obligation to give you a warning prior to further punishment, and they don't. Chances are however that staff still heavily hand out more warnings than actual punishment, not that I can back that up with stats though.