What do you think of the current Classic worlds?

[Lord Sephiroth]

Originally Posted by Darlene159

I don't really play much anymore, but they should all have regular inspections by the pwa, and if they don't fit the requirements to be left on classic, then they should be removed.
I also think that punishments for breaking the rules should be dealt with stricter.

As James said the problem with that is having a fully established, well running PWA Team which graal currently lacks.

Also, If that were the case we'd be removing current servers and we'd have like 2 or 3 on the classic list (That may not be a problem for some people), because the current expectations of UC servers are way too high, we'd never see a new server.

We're lucky we got Zodiac with their laggy scripts.

[Yen]

Originally Posted by Lord Sephiroth

As James said the problem with that is having a fully established, well running PWA Team which graal currently lacks.

Also, If that were the case we'd be removing current servers and we'd have like 2 or 3 on the classic list (That may not be a problem for some people), because the current expectations of UC servers are way too high, we'd never see a new server.

We're lucky we got Zodiac with their laggy scripts.

You have to understand that Graal's servers host up to 30 playerworlds on the same machine.
Zodiac requires a lot of server <-> client communication, to keep things such as HP, MP, ect. updated.
Also, we use a lot of spell effects and the such. It's not mean't for old computers; if you experience slow down while playing, your computer is too old. In my experience, most of Graal has out of date/crappy computers.