GS1 VS GS2 (Split from Domination thread)

[falco10291029]

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

Nor did I claim otherwise. However, the context actually demanded a comparison, and it is not arrogant to comply.

But you did so in an arrogant way

Do you have any actual arguments, or are you just gonna keep telling me what you think?

Do you have any actual arguments, or are you going to keep asking me stupid questions about additional comments added that have nothing to do with the argument?

I think this answers my question.

The answer is neither. If you didn't get that (and I know you didn't) it shows even further the bias you put into your arguments. I made no indication that I made any of this up, and quite frankly there are things that everyone takes into consideration when judging for arrogance.

So? Tell me, what is the purpose of beliefs/working assumptions? And can you show that they don't meet this purpose?

They cause falsely lead biases towards someone, which as yo have shown greatly flaw your arguments because of a mindset that you cannot lose against such a person. This causes stubborness and uncertainty in your arguments along with the famed "No I;m right, you are wrong".

Why do you do it if you think it is sub-optimal?

I try not to, and I do let it influence me less than most people do. However in extreme cases i am unable to help myself.

Okay. But I asked you a different question: Why do you prefer to use 'was' at inappropriate times?

I like the sound better, simple as that.

Then I cannot see why it would be so difficult to find a single example.

Because I don't wish to look for it. Your arguments usdualyl encompass many pages and it is usually one post in there. I don't wish to root through them to satisfy you.

Then provide a quote. It is possible that I have said something similar, but your mind has warped it to fit the circumstance.

I can't provide an exact quote, but the conversation went something like:

me: he ignored the post, isn't that bad arguing skills according to you?

you: No, ignoring individual responses is a bad argument skill. Ignoring a post may be due to tiring of that argument.

Once more, empty assertions. They don't win you anything, dude. Anybody can scream about how "EVERYBODY ELSE IS DUMB, ONLY I CAN SEE TEH TRUTH", but it doesn't tend to be persuasive.

Before saying something like this, quit doing the same thing yourself. Hypocrite....

[Kaimetsu]

Originally Posted by falco10291029

But you did so in an arrogant way

NO, U DID.

Seriously, man. It gets boring after a while.

Do you have any actual arguments, or are you going to keep asking me stupid questions about additional comments

Haha. Dude, if you try to make some kind of point and it doesn't happen to be admissable, I'm gonna say so. Solution: Don't make 'points' that're just statements of opinion.

I made no indication that I made any of this up, and quite frankly there are things that everyone takes into consideration when judging for arrogance

Perhaps so. But you haven't shown that they would incriminate me any more than you. All you've done is repeatedly state your opinion.

They cause falsely lead biases towards someone

No, I asked for their purpose. That is not their purpose.

as yo have shown greatly flaw your arguments because of a mindset that you cannot lose against such a person. This causes stubborness and uncertainty in your arguments along with the famed "No I;m right, you are wrong"

Gahaha.

Am I stubborn because I think you're wrong? Then why doesn't the same apply to you?
What uncertainty in my arguments?
And dude, you cannot make accusations like that after saying "your stubborness blinds you from the truth". You think you're right, I think I'm right. What's the difference? Stop being so hypocritical.

I try not to, and I do let it influence me less than most people do. However in extreme cases i am unable to help myself

"extreme cases", huh? Are these rare, then?

The reality is that nobody can function as a normal human being without belief. You need to believe that the sun will rise, that gravity will keep us glued to the floor, that speeding cars can hurt us. We believe these things because, assuming certain axioms, they conform to our experiences and increase our chances of acting in an efficient manner.

Your arguments are essentially that we should ignore everything that we see or learn. Perhaps this explains quite a lot.

I like the sound better, simple as that

Mm-hm. Would you accept that excuse, if you were in my situation? I mean, it's basically universally applicable. At what point do you conclude that the person is lying?

Because I don't wish to look for it. Your arguments usdualyl encompass many pages and it is usually one post in there. I don't wish to root through them to satisfy you

Well, it's not just to satisfy me. It's to turn your post from an empty accusation into a valid point.

I can't provide an exact quote, but the conversation went something like:

me: he ignored the post, isn't that bad arguing skills according to you?
you: No, ignoring individual responses is a bad argument skill. Ignoring a post may be due to tiring of that argument

As I recall, it went like this:

me: Hey Falco, why do you always accuse people of saying stupid things on the forums?
you: BC I CANT THIKN OF NE GOOD POINTS

I WIN!

Before saying something like this, quit doing the same thing yourself. Hypocrite....

Before saying something like this, show that your opponent is actually doing it.