Miscellaneous Kingdom Discussion

[busyrobot]

Originally Posted by Zurkiba

The fact of the matter is this, I've already ANSWERED your "arguements" (if that's what you want to call them) and you're just filibustering now.

My arguements have not been broken down, I'm just not going to repeat myself to bicker over the internet.

Then do quote your words of wisdom and put me in my place. So far all I have seen is you say "Zormite is fish" dispite the fact it has clearly not been, that "Nappa is a true Zormite" when no one in Zormite would consider him one and he fails any meaningful test of what it is to be Zormite.

You have said that "2k1 is more important than 2k2" without giving any reason why. You have made the -decent- point that the sequential story line of 2k1 to 2k2 is broken by the shift to humans, and I never disagreed with that. I have not seen you make any argument though how preserving that story line at the expense of GK history is in GK's better interest or serves the interests of why 2k1/2k2 had a storyline in the first place.

I cannot filibuster as there is nothing you can do that I would block. Everyone in Zormite and the probably most other active players in GK consider the idea cracked.
Even if you convinced Stefan to force a change against the people of Zormite's own will, that is not something I can effect and therefore still can't be considered filibustering against.

You have not given any reason why 2k1's history, is more important than 2k2's history. You have stated that it makes a story, and that the story is better preserved by ratifying 2k2's history. But if you are going to ratify the story at all, why not ratify the 2k1 history instead, since no one has been playing with the derivations that set that history apart from GK...for the entire history of GK? That would have a much smaller (zero actually) impact on players today, yet would fix the discrepency that bothers you so much.

Personally, I think that the hiccup in the history, should be worked around in a way that preserves both histories the best, but I guess I am sentimental that way. I suppose if you are really die hard set on having a consistent storybook style history, it would not bother me if you changed 2k1 to fit 2k2's history, but I suspect it would bother a lot of old players, and if that was the case I'd still end up arguing it should be left alone or the impact minimized.