Another of these...

[Thallen]

Quit developing new versions that are minutely 'better' than the previous version. Quit spending hours trying to come up with new ideas that will attract players: obviously we don't want 3D, we don't want need guns. Instead of spending time coming up with new payment plans, why don't you help out current playerworld, develop them with the players, or at least the more 'professional' ones, like Classic. WE DO NOT WANT NEWER, SHINIER VERSIONS. GRAAL WAS FINE HOW IT WAS BACK IN 2000. WE WANT BETTER PLAY, AND THIS IS OBTAINED BY CHANGE. THE CHANGE GRAALIANS WANT IS NOT IN THE CLIENT INTERFACE, BUT IN THE PLAYERWORLDS.

Call this a rant or whatever, but can someone tell me how successful Graal GBA was? Anyone wanna let me know where the hype and anticipation in Graal 3D is. There is none. Graal is going at a steady downfall because Stefan and Unixmad don't listen to players. Well listen, for once! I think the majority of the long-playing Graal community is interested in more high-quality playerworlds than in high-quality versions and choppy 3D graphics. I've posted so many topics like this. Quit trying to make Graal into a Runescape, an Everquest, it's not going to happen. Please, understand that we don't want this high-tech, sleek looking game client on a Zelda-copy game that is slowly morphing into Grand Theft Auto or something. Can we get some consistancy here? Graal has no definition anymore, it isn't an online medieval 'roleplaying' game, like Zelda, it's an online, never-changing chat room, containing swords, guns, 3D and 2D-mix graphics, uncompleted playerworlds, and oblivious players who shouldn't be paying for renting playerworlds, because nothing new has come out in the game itself in forever. I'd rather see Babylon released once again more than I would like to see Graal 3D be released, and Babylon will probably be more successful. I'd rather see Graal Classic be restored and up-and-running more than I'd like to see a lame GUI on the startup client. Am I the only player like this?