lyndzey?

[Kaimetsu]

Originally posted by konidias
I'm not saying that. I'm saying, that the entire thread turned into a "let's bash koni and his joke" thread.

Not really... we were pretty much the only people talking about it, and it only last a page or so.

I still feel I did nothing wrong, and now even Lyndzey said she was not offended. So why should I sit here and get accused of being some sexual predator?

Um, those two factors don't mean you're not some kind of sexual predator.

If it was such a big ordeal, and you were questioning the legality of it, don't you think it shouldn't be discussed in the public? These kind of issues are supposed to be handled privately.

Why?

If Tseng had a problem with my post, he could click the "report this post to moderator" link.

Indeed, but it wasn't really a matter for moderation. I don't think it was delete-worthy, I just think it's a tasteless joke.

He didn't need to sit here and try and make me look like a bad guy, and turn this into a huge arguement, and you surely didn't need to help him.

You make yourself look like a bad guy, man. We were only trying to point that out.

You preach that people should be able to speak their opinion, yet you've deleted my posts in the past because my opinion clashed against yours.

Mmm, no, I don't think so. Unless your opinion is something like 'spam is okay'.

You override all the rules that are set on the forums, by saying you are making "judgement" calls. Well your judgement is severely flawed, and you shouldn't rely on it. That is my opinion.

I don't override anything. I don't say 'this is spam, but I won't delete it'. If I see spam, I deal with it. If I don't think it qualifies (and, sorry, but personal judgement is a huge part of defining spam), then I leave it alone.

You think my judgement is flawed. That's fine, you're entitled to it. I think you're unable to consider your own fallibility. That's my opinion.

If you think it's okay to sit here and pick on a person, and make an arguement about it that spans many pages

Many pages? I don't think so. Pick on a person? I didn't argue on the topic to make you feel bad, I did it to show you that you were making tasteless and sexually offensive jokes.

Could it not be said that you are now 'picking on' me? I thought you weren't going to argue anymore.

yet it's not okay for me to post "..." because it's in the wrong bloody context, then your judgement is ridiculous.

You spammed. What more can I say? You're not allowed to spam.

[Lance]

Originally posted by konidias


Who said I was speaking about this thread in particular?

Your observational skills are lacking, because I most certainly didn't say such a thing. Your arguments might have merit if they actually had some bases.

[Splke]

o_O Kay, cant read it all, too boring... Filled with big words and hypocritical statements from the both parties.. Koni made a funny... XD It was actually an OK joke.. better then afew i've heard...

IM GUESSING, he has an inside joke with some people, and decided to say that as another way of saying "<3" .. wait, he said that too... maybe it means like, "uber <3" or something... I dont know. But you guys are blowing this out of proportion... its not that big of a deal if Lyndzey didnt take offense to it..

You guys are just like "OMG THATS SEXUAL HARRASSMENT" and you keep bringing up past things that he may of done to other people... And you sit there saying your NOT trying to make him look like the bad man... You say you guys were only trying to "point that out"... WELL YOU DID IT SO GET OFF HIS CASE... I mean, damn... You guys need to lay off...

Maybe your just aimming for a higher post count, but what Koni says in the most-cases i've seen... He's been right, and somebodys always been there to criticize his opinion... Its nice if somebody is giving healthy criticizm(omg sp), but you two are being negative, and have been for the past 5 pages... So... just lay off. You pointed out his joke had very low humour quality, as well as potential to be considered sexual harrassment. OK Great, now you dont need to carry on this arguement... It's already been adressed his joke wasnt that great... so yeah.. x.x

[Kaimetsu]

Originally posted by Splke
It was actually an OK joke.. better then afew i've heard...

Unfortunately, it is only better than a few.

IM GUESSING, he has an inside joke with some people, and decided to say that as another way of saying "<3"

Absolutely. However, it's still demeaning and crude, and indicative of some kind of unhealthy obsession.

You say you guys were only trying to "point that out"... WELL YOU DID IT SO GET OFF HIS CASE...

Um, if he argues against our points then clearly our message has not been properly received. Hence, we clarify.

Maybe your just aimming for a higher post count, but what Koni says in the most-cases i've seen... He's been right

Oh, well, then I guess he must be correct here too!

Its nice if somebody is giving healthy criticizm(omg sp), but you two are being negative, and have been for the past 5 pages...

I haven't even been posting for the last five pages.

And yeah, I guess it could be seen as negativity. But there's no positive way to tell somebody that they're acting in a reprehensible fashion.

[So... just lay off. You pointed out his joke had very low humour quality, as well as potential to be considered sexual harrassment. OK Great, now you dont need to carry on this arguement...

Here's a fun little game for you to play: Look through the thread, and find all the people who're arguing. Then check if any of their names are 'Konidias'. If so, hit yourself in the face!

[jake13jake]

Well... I'll just let this be said Lance. If I were trying to run a business, I wouldn't hire you because you have extremely poor judgement.

Hell... I doubt I'll feed Stefan more money for VIP. I paid for it so that I could have access the forums. Now I must change my mind with corrupt moderators like you...

The other reason I bought VIP is so that I could see Graal 3.0... but, you know?... that appeal loses its bang after you see it.

This reminds me sort of how GPs used to handle profanity in profile cases by taking into account that you didn't necessarily HAVE TO look in the profile, when the answer is clear as day that the profanity should be removed and the person spend time in jail or get banned.

[Kaimetsu]

Originally posted by jake13jake
Well... I'll just let this be said Lance. If I were trying to run a business, I wouldn't hire you because you have extremely poor judgement.

Hell... I doubt I'll feed Stefan more money for VIP. I paid for it so that I could have access the forums. Now I must change my mind with corrupt moderators like you...

Um. Lance isn't a moderator. What poor judgement? At least specify the stuff you're criticising, man.

This reminds me sort of how GPs used to handle profanity in profile cases by taking into account that you didn't necessarily HAVE TO look in the profile

What? Where's the parallel?

[Neoreno]

Originally posted by Kaimetsu
What? Where's the parallel?

I don't even understand the point he's trying to get across.

[Darlene159]

Splke,

2 words...common sense
find some and use it please....

Meaning: The issue here was never whether you or others were offended, the issue was/is that some people might have been offended, and it should NEVER have been said. Things like that DO NOT belong on a children's game, no matter how you try to glorify it, it was wrong.

Also, you might want to go back and read the Graal rules that you agreed to...very enlighting

[Lance]

Originally posted by jake13jake
Well... I'll just let this be said Lance. If I were trying to run a business, I wouldn't hire you because you have extremely poor judgement.

Really? Example?

Hell... I doubt I'll feed Stefan more money for VIP. I paid for it so that I could have access the forums. Now I must change my mind with corrupt moderators like you...

I'm not a moderator; at least not in this part of the forums. I as a forumgoer raised a valid question. You've yet to respond to my points, instead choosing to foolishly insult myself and Kaimetsu. Sorry, buddy, but that just doesn't fly around here.

This reminds me sort of how GPs used to handle profanity in profile cases by taking into account that you didn't necessarily HAVE TO look in the profile, when the answer is clear as day that the profanity should be removed and the person spend time in jail or get banned.

Your statement makes no sense. Wouldn't the GP have to look in the profile to see that the profanity is there?

[jake13jake]

Originally posted by Lance


Really? Example?


I'm not a moderator; at least not in this part of the forums. I as a forumgoer raised a valid question. You've yet to respond to my points, instead choosing to foolishly insult myself and Kaimetsu. Sorry, buddy, but that just doesn't fly around here.



Your statement makes no sense. Wouldn't the GP have to look in the profile to see that the profanity is there?

yea... you're smart.

[Lance]

Oh, I think I found your point after a bit more sifting through the nonsense. I don't see how by saying those GPs handled things incorrectly somehow harms my point; in fact, it strengthens it.

[WkD66]

There's been enough topics in this one thread to have a forum of it's own ;P