100KBs rule

Hiro · #1 03-08-2005, 03:05 AM

I think we need to 100KBs rule changed to 300KBs. I think most people can handle 300KB size images in peoples signatures by now. If if you can't, right-click and hit, "block image" so you won't see it.

So, can we raise the rule from 100KBs to 300KBs?

Akoalin · #2 03-08-2005, 03:08 AM

No sig should be 300kbs. If it is, you seriously need to compress it to a smaller format (anything but JPEG and 24 bit bmp).

Hiro · #3 03-08-2005, 03:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Akoalin

No sig should be 300kbs. If it is, you seriously need to compress it to a smaller format (anything but JPEG and 24 bit bmp).

What about gif. I ment moving objects.

And this apperently needs to be moved.

Kaimetsu · #4 03-08-2005, 03:27 AM

Do you really need an animated signature?

Dach · #5 03-08-2005, 04:45 AM

Ajira · #6 03-08-2005, 05:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

Do you really need an animated signature?

Do you really need one?

Kaimetsu · #7 03-08-2005, 05:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ajira

Do you really need one?

Hah, good point. I don't need one, no.

zell12 · #8 03-08-2005, 06:33 AM

Do you need an animated signature that is over 100kb in size?

Spark910 · #9 03-08-2005, 12:28 PM

Considering the default posts per page, and if you increased the signtuare size limit, then you will end up with pages that would take 3-5minutes to load on dial-up!

Zero Hour · #10 03-08-2005, 05:31 PM

Yea, and hands down, that dancing girl was annoying. That stupid had of hers... ¬_¬

Hiro · #11 03-08-2005, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zero Hour

Yea, and hands down, that dancing girl was annoying. That stupid had of hers... ¬_¬

No way, she owns.

And I know people on dial-up who said that my size signature didn't cause them any problems - and if there was any problem, it was only seconds off. So unless your computer is like, a celeron 1MB hard-drive, no mouse laptop, maybe you'll lag.

Evil_Trunks · #12 03-08-2005, 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ajira

Do you really need one?

2.07 KB (2121 bytes)

Crono · #13 03-08-2005, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hiro

No way, she owns.

Her ass shaking was too tempting. Glad she's gone

Darlene159 · #14 03-08-2005, 06:36 PM

There is no reason for it to be raised.

Hiro · #15 03-08-2005, 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159

There is no reason for it to be raised.

Only to the blind eye and those with crappy computers with live in teh ghett0.

Darlene159 · #16 03-08-2005, 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hiro

Only to the blind eye and those with crappy computers with live in teh ghett0.

wow, there you go bashing groups of people............again!
What is wrong with you?
Do you think people are terrible because they cant afford an awesome computers, with awesome video cards, and awesome graphics cards, with awesome connections?
I hardly think it will kill you to keep your sig at or under 100kb

Crono · #17 03-08-2005, 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hiro

Only to the blind eye and those with crappy computers with live in teh ghett0.

Dude you're an idiot (dont care if im flaming you, you deserve it), some people here can't afford 56k or their areas dont support it. Stop bashing them and maybe people will stop doing the same to you.

Quote:

with awesome video cards, and awesome graphics cards

Um..Moonie..video card and graphics card is the same thing.

Darlene159 · #18 03-08-2005, 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerami

Um..Moonie..video card and graphics card is the same thing.

lol, I knew that

Skyld · #19 03-08-2005, 07:39 PM

When I'm foruming on my Pocket PC, I often have to disable images completely to get any page to load in a timely fashion because people's signatures.
It has a fairly good wireless connection, but it is only 400MHz in power.
For those without the power or connection to spare, images are in general a pain, nevermind ones that require more time to download. Keep the rule at 100kb/s max.
As for the probable comments about using a Pocket PC, please be aware that I do not care.

Kaimetsu · #20 03-08-2005, 07:43 PM

And the maximum height should be reduced, too.

Zero Hour · #21 03-08-2005, 07:59 PM

What are the current extremities for signatures?

Chris · #22 03-08-2005, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zero Hour

What are the current extremities for signatures?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159

SIGNATURES AND AVATARS

The size of signatures is limited for the benefit of all users. The width and height limits are 550 pixels and 300 pixels respectively. The maximum data size is 100KB. Please note that these limits refer to the properties of the entire sig, and not individual elements thereof.

Users are not permitted to set signatures or avatars that mimic those of another member, without his/her explicit permission. The moderators reserve the right to arbitrate on whether or not a signature violates this rule.

You are permitted to include a section in your signature that links directly to the rating system of the board. However, there are two conditions: Firstly, the full range of values must be presented as options. Secondly, they must all be clearly labeled, informing other users of their purpose.

I believe this is what you asked for.

Hiro · #23 03-08-2005, 09:09 PM

Yup, there I go again.

zell12 · #24 03-08-2005, 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hiro

Yup, there I go again.

You should probably just quit it now.

Ajira · #25 03-08-2005, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evil_Trunks

2.07 KB (2121 bytes)

That was not the point, but I'm sure you knew that.

Crono · #26 03-08-2005, 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ajira

That was not the point, but I'm sure you knew that.

Then wtf was the point of this post dude

I like Kai's sig, never realized it was only 2kb

Ajira · #27 03-08-2005, 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerami

Then wtf was the point of this post dude

I like Kai's sig, never realized it was only 2kb

I was not referring to the point of this post. Go read through the whole thread, dude.

Crono · #28 03-08-2005, 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ajira

I was not referring to the point of this post. Go read through the whole thread, dude.

Woah sorry. I thought you were Hiro responding to the post given to him. Heh, luvs u <3

Hiro · #29 03-09-2005, 12:43 AM

Yeah..

Hence why 3kb would be great-o.

Maybe if I cleared out my entire sig and only put in my dancing girl, no one would care. Either that, or it's just a personal thing.

Kaimetsu · #30 03-09-2005, 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hiro

3kb would be great-o

If that were the case, I'd be one of the only people with a legal sig.

Hiro · #31 03-09-2005, 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

If that were the case, I'd be one of the only people with a legal sig.

misread.

Kaimetsu · #32 03-09-2005, 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hiro

misread.

What did I misread?

Hiro · #33 03-09-2005, 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

What did I misread?

No I did.

Darlene159 · #34 03-09-2005, 01:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hiro

Maybe if I cleared out my entire sig and only put in my dancing girl, no one would care. Either that, or it's just a personal thing.

I believe your sig was between 300 and 400kb, just for the dancing person

<Edit> correction, it was over 200kb <Edit>

Zero Hour · #35 03-09-2005, 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159

I believe your sig was between 300 and 400kb, just for the dancing person

<Edit> correction, it was over 200kb <Edit>

And annoying! Especially her stupid hat...

NeoJenova · #36 03-09-2005, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hiro

Only to the blind eye and those with crappy computers with live in teh ghett0.

My ghetto is so clean, with very few ****roaches.

Spark910 · #37 03-09-2005, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zero Hour

And annoying! Especially her stupid hat...

It wasn't that bad!
And I think mine would be 3KB <

pacMASTA · #38 03-09-2005, 01:39 PM

Mines pretty big and its only 23.6kb

Hiro · #39 03-10-2005, 12:53 AM

Her hat wasn't stupid.

Zero Hour · #40 03-10-2005, 02:43 AM

Well, her dancing around with... a single pant leg for what one may call "a skirt" was stupid. But I still insist; her hat is stupid.