bye...

falco10291029 · #1 05-29-2005, 07:27 AM

I suppose i should have posted this a while ago, I havent played graal since i decided to give up on EK. Since there are few who will care that I am going, i will keep this short.

This isn't because of staff, I have never had problems with them.

This isn't because of players, though lack of them working at EK certainly didnt help.

I just am not having fun when i play graal anymore. I went through a bunch of servers, and didnt seem to have much fun. None are anything great. None. SO I bid you all goodbye, and i would appreciate (though I dont expect it to happen) if there wouldnt be 50,0000 "alright, he's finally leaving!"s. Bye

EDIT: One more thing. SO I can see how many people actualyl think i'm an idiot on the forums, I ask that all that do sign this. This is purely for my own amusement.

Gambet · #2 05-29-2005, 07:40 AM

Cya. G'luck and have fun with what you choose to do next!

falco10291029 · #3 05-29-2005, 07:41 AM

*has a heart attack since the first reply wasnt a falco hater*

Velox Cruentus · #4 05-29-2005, 07:54 AM

Umm... Ciao. I don't really know you, but the reasons your quitting are quite valid.

Enjoy yourself, will ye?

Darlene159 · #5 05-29-2005, 02:49 PM

Bye, good luck to you

protagonist · #6 05-29-2005, 05:50 PM

Have fun, dude.

Brad · #7 05-29-2005, 05:58 PM

i dont remember if I liked you or not

Splke · #8 05-29-2005, 06:02 PM

hes cool. he battled wits with kai

later dudes. stay clean (aka no graal)

falco10291029 · #9 05-29-2005, 10:35 PM

*waits for kai to say something like "it wasnt a battle, the enemy was unarmed"*

Kaimetsu · #10 05-30-2005, 01:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by falco10291029

*waits for kai to say something like "it wasnt a battle, the enemy was unarmed"*

Please do not put stupid words into my mouth.

falco10291029 · #11 05-30-2005, 04:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

Please do not put stupid words into my mouth.

never did. I was merely pointing out what i expected from you based on experience.

Kaimetsu · #12 05-30-2005, 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by falco10291029

never did

That would depend on how ineptly you interpret my request.

falco10291029 · #13 05-30-2005, 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

That would depend on how ineptly you interpret my request.

OR how you interpret my post. it isn't always me that's wrong, now stop arguing with me on my goodbye thread, i dont need it.

Crono · #14 05-29-2005, 10:53 PM

Cya man, signed your idiot thingy for fun.

zim5354 · #15 05-30-2005, 06:56 AM

kai dude he is leaving why must you be such a arse all the time?

Methril · #16 05-30-2005, 07:35 AM

It is maybe not that he is an arse, it may be that he has to respond to anything, regardless of validity or and necessity. I have yet to figure it out completely.

And yes your reasons for leaving are completly true, Graal is just not fun because of every server being lame. Hopefully you find something usefull to entertain yourself with.

Velox Cruentus · #17 05-30-2005, 04:12 PM

"Those who control's the past, controls the present. Those who controls the present, controls the future"... History controls the present and future.

Kai -- Don't go into it.... It'll just get this thread shut down. It's not quite the right time to talk about unproven theories and possibilities.

As for the 'putting words in mouth', it's not quite... It's merely suggesting that you have a possibility of such outcome, as your words. It is simular to putting word's in gods mouth of how the universe was created. (No, I don't believe in god.) This would refer more to actually doing it: "Kaimetsu said 'Yes'". That would be considered putting words in your mouth if you hadn't said 'Yes.'

Malinko · #18 05-30-2005, 04:17 PM

Kind of late, but good luck in the future!

Bye.

Brad · #19 05-31-2005, 12:33 AM

get a life

Kaimetsu · #20 05-31-2005, 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad

get a life

One like yours? Please god no.

Brad · #21 05-31-2005, 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

One like yours? Please god no.

Spending hours on end online trying to prove how smart you are must be much better. I ask God every day why I can't be more like you. Congratulations man on harassing someone 5+ years younger then you. What do you get for this amazing accomplishment? A cyber-pat on the back and more kids thinking you're a complete ass. CONGRATZ2UTHO

Kaimetsu · #22 05-31-2005, 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad

Spending hours on end online trying to prove how smart you are must be much better

Than spending hours on end offline trying to prove how stupid you are? Yeah, probably.

Brad · #23 05-31-2005, 12:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

Than spending hours on end offline trying to prove how stupid you are? Yeah, probably.

See while earlier you got words put in your mouth you're just making things up now. You've proved time in and time out that you're pathetic and most of your posts are just trying to prove how superior you are to others. You know nothing about me offline, therefore you can't really say I try to prove I'm stupid. Good comeback though sweetums.

plz call me stupd plz or sey i am wste 0f lyf or sumthin plz

protagonist · #24 05-31-2005, 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

Than spending hours on end offline trying to prove how stupid you are? Yeah, probably.

PLZ

SHHH OMG >_> <_<

FIND SUMTHIN BETTER 2 DO THAN R-GEW OVR ST00P1D STUFFS

osrs · #25 05-31-2005, 01:21 AM

Bye bye.

Brad · #26 05-31-2005, 04:57 AM

wait wait wait wait

I care about what others think of me? What the hell are you reading? I do what I want and have never once tried to fit in. Ever. You honestly have no idea who I am. I never said I don't insult people. I insult people I don't like, but I stick up for people too. You just seem to pick random kids to insult. If I knew how to bold things I'd bold KIDS. You are arguing against CHILDREN.

Kaimetsu · #27 05-31-2005, 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad

I care about what others think of me? What the hell are you reading? I do what I want and have never once tried to fit in

Haha. I don't think that's entirely accurate, but the point isn't particularly relevant, is it? You yourself earlier claimed that your online and offline personas are not identical - and now you're telling me that you mustn't seek approval offline since you don't do it online?

Quote:

I never said I don't insult people

You didn't answer my point. You insult and argue just as I do. Does this mean that you too are constantly seeking to prove yourself superior? It works both ways, dawg.

Quote:

You are arguing against CHILDREN.

Sometimes. Most of the people I argue with are within a few years of my age, so I don't really see your point. Even if your claim were accurate, what would it mean? Is there something inherently wrong with talking to people younger than you?

Darlene159 · #28 05-31-2005, 10:39 PM

ugh, falco you got exactly what you asked for when you posted something about Kaimetsu...you know as well as anyone else who has been on the otherside of the debate with him that if you say something about him, he WILL respond...you are going out exactly how you wanted to.....

falco10291029 · #29 05-31-2005, 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159

...you are going out exactly how you wanted to.....

Only if I win. That'd be great. Leaving knowing that I am one of the few victorious against Kai. That'd be something.

osrs · #30 05-31-2005, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by falco10291029

Only if I win. That'd be great. Leaving knowing that I am one of the few victorious against Kai. That'd be something.

I don't think you will succeed.

falco10291029 · #31 06-01-2005, 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by osrs

I don't think you will succeed.

We'll see. I am 99.5% sure that I am at the right here.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159

You missed my point, I was saying you made the remark to get Kaimetsu to reply, so therefore, you started the whole thing

I did not do that with that intent. I was merely in a bad mood at the time and posted what i exspected. I said I would liekt o go out by beating kai. I never said that i preplanned it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trevor

You're such a loser, dude. You pick a fight with someone so you go out with glory? Not only is that a dumb thing to do, but your plan is also failing.

See above. Also, I'm not failing. Neither one of us is really winning at this point.

Darlene159 · #32 05-31-2005, 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by falco10291029

Only if I win. That'd be great. Leaving knowing that I am one of the few victorious against Kai. That'd be something.

You missed my point, I was saying you made the remark to get Kaimetsu to reply, so therefore, you started the whole thing

Velox Cruentus · #33 06-01-2005, 03:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159

You missed my point, I was saying you made the remark to get Kaimetsu to reply, so therefore, you started the whole thing

I guess that was what he wanted. Let him argue his life away... I don't know who's better: Falco who basically picks a fight on particular individuals to prove he's superior then them... Or Kaimetsu who actually spends his time wasting it on someone who argues for the sakes of proving he's stubburn. As far as I know, it's a waste of time, and a good way to get post counts.

Kaimetsu · #34 06-01-2005, 04:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Velox Cruentus

I don't know who's better: Falco who basically picks a fight on particular individuals to prove he's superior then them... Or Kaimetsu who actually spends his time wasting it on someone who argues for the sakes of proving he's stubburn

Me, obviously. I argue because it's fun, and also because it's an excuse to work on my writing skills (given the incredible clumsiness of your second sentence, you should probably consider taking my lead). How can it be a waste of time if it fulfils my objectives?

With that in mind, the comparison is simple: Falco fails in his goal, while I do not.

Trevor · #35 06-01-2005, 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by falco10291029

Only if I win. That'd be great. Leaving knowing that I am one of the few victorious against Kai. That'd be something.

You're such a loser, dude. You pick a fight with someone so you go out with glory? Not only is that a dumb thing to do, but your plan is also failing.

Two stupid actions don't make a... never mind

zim5354 · #36 05-31-2005, 11:24 PM

aye i think he did take a look :-/

falco10291029 · #37 06-01-2005, 03:54 AM

it's the other way around. I have maybe picked 1 fight in my whole time imn these forums. Kai, on the other hand....

falco10291029 · #38 06-01-2005, 04:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

So if I said: "Falco will say something very stupid in response to this post" then I wouldn't be saying anything bad? You think that statements of expectations cannot be derogatory remarks?

If you said "I think Falco will say something...etc" I wouldnt think of it as bad. it's your opinion. It may be derogatory, but it isnt necessarily an attack meant to start an argument.

Quote:

I simply asked you not to attribute words to me. You were the one that started the argument over language.

Ah, giving a "No, you started it" to spice up your arguments? Hmm, very nice tactics (I'm obviously joking, for any *****s out there).

Quote:

No? You've repeatedly stated that I could have ignored you, as though this is enough to show that I started the argument. But you don't extend this to any other type of confrontation?

I said that was one possible solution. It wasnt a direct attack, while punching someone is. Different situation.

Quote:

No, I said you asserted that you were right. I don't even wanna get into assumptions.

Fine.

Quote:

In all of my posts that you quoted, I was either stating or clarifying my position. In the final post - yours - you simply reiterated what you'd asserted before and declared that you were right.

I dont see how what you did was any better. There's a pretty clear line between clarification and declaring you're right. You were on the latter side, the second time around.

Quote:

Haha, that's what I expected. Why do you make these accusations if you're never prepared to back them up?

"it was just a flippant comment."

Quote:

If a person's point is irrelevant then yeah, I'll draw attention to that. So what? How would that tendency forbid me from making flippant comments?

They aren't relevant to the overall argument.

Kaimetsu · #39 06-01-2005, 04:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by falco10291029

If you said "I think Falco will say something...etc" I wouldnt think of it as bad. it's your opinion

So statements of opinions can't start arguments? What can?

Quote:

It may be derogatory, but it isnt necessarily an attack meant to start an argument

You're being patently ludicrous. If somebody makes a derogatory remark about me and I respond, I'm the one starting the argument? And yet if somebody punches me then he started the fight? How do you explain this distinction?

Quote:

Ah, giving a "No, you started it" to spice up your arguments?

Um. Ostensibly this is a 'joke'? If so, why are you hiding behind it? I made a point: You started the discussion of language when you challenged my use of it.

Quote:

I said that was one possible solution. It wasnt a direct attack, while punching someone is

Define "direct attack", and then show that it makes a difference.

Quote:

I dont see how what you did was any better. There's a pretty clear line between clarification and declaring you're right. You were on the latter side, the second time around

Completely untrue. My first post summarised what you did and then claimed that it constituted putting words in my mouth. My second defined exactly what the phrase means. I didn't even declare that either of us was right or wrong - I just said my piece and left it at that.

You, on the other hand, started with the declaration that I was wrong and then repeated your definition of the phrase. You apparently think that the winner is whoever can continue to say "I'M RIGHT NANANA" for the longest before he gets bored.

Quote:

"it was just a flippant comment."

No, it was a direct accusation meant to undermine what I had posted. You can abandon it now and pretend you were only kidding, but it won't do much for your credibility.

Quote:

They aren't relevant to the overall argument

Nor were they meant to be (and, by your own logic, nor was your claim that you're not always wrong). I don't reject statements just because they're irrelevant. But if my opponent is using them in attempts to support his cause then yeah, I'll take issue with them.

falco10291029 · #40 06-01-2005, 04:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

So statements of opinions can't start arguments? What can?

The conflicting opinion put against it.

Quote:

You're being patently ludicrous. If somebody makes a derogatory remark about me and I respond, I'm the one starting the argument? And yet if somebody punches me then he started the fight? How do you explain this distinction?

"I want to punch him, he deserves it". Someone punches him. Indirect.

Person described above just Punches him.direct

"I think you wil ldo this". Indirect.

"You will do this". Direct.

Want me to reiterate this about 50 more times? WIl lyou understand then?

Quote:

Um. Ostensibly this is a 'joke'? If so, why are you hiding behind it? I made a point: You started the discussion of language when you challenged my use of it.

You accused me of something I did not do. That started it.

Quote:

Define "direct attack", and then show that it makes a difference.

See above.

Quote:

Completely untrue. My first post summarised what you did and then claimed that it constituted putting words in my mouth. My second defined exactly what the phrase means. I didn't even declare that either of us was right or wrong - I just said my piece and left it at that.

"No, not really" is saying i am wrong. There's one thing wrong with this argument. I did the same thing you did postwise, also. The last one is the only one then, by your standards, that could arguably be considered asserting I am right with no backing. Though by your standards, it was further clarification.

Quote:

You, on the other hand, started with the declaration that I was wrong and then repeated your definition of the phrase. You apparently think that the winner is whoever can continue to say "I'M RIGHT NANANA" for the longest before he gets bored.

No, see above.

At this point, the only thign we could clarify is who started the argument. With no written definition of what putting words in one's mouth is, it makes this whole argument pointless. If you wish to continue though, I can.