bye...
 

I suppose i should have posted this a while ago, I havent played graal since i decided to give up on EK. Since there are few who will care that I am going, i will keep this short.


This isn't because of staff, I have never had problems with them.

This isn't because of players, though lack of them working at EK certainly didnt help.

I just am not having fun when i play graal anymore. I went through a bunch of servers, and didnt seem to have much fun. None are anything great. None. SO I bid you all goodbye, and i would appreciate (though I dont expect it to happen) if there wouldnt be 50,0000 "alright, he's finally leaving!"s. Bye


EDIT: One more thing. SO I can see how many people actualyl think i'm an idiot on the forums, I ask that all that do sign this. This is purely for my own amusement.

Cya. G'luck and have fun with what you choose to do next!

*has a heart attack since the first reply wasnt a falco hater* ;)

Umm... Ciao. I don't really know you, but the reasons your quitting are quite valid.

Enjoy yourself, will ye?

Bye, good luck to you

Have fun, dude.

i dont remember if I liked you or not

hes cool. he battled wits with kai

later dudes. stay clean (aka no graal)

*waits for kai to say something like "it wasnt a battle, the enemy was unarmed"*

Cya man, signed your idiot thingy for fun. :D

Please do not put stupid words into my mouth.

never did. I was merely pointing out what i expected from you based on experience.

That would depend on how ineptly you interpret my request.

OR how you interpret my post. it isn't always me that's wrong, now stop arguing with me on my goodbye thread, i dont need it.

No, not really. What interpretations are there? You forwarded some text and claimed that I might say something similar. This is very much a case of putting words in my mouth.

History suggests otherwise.

kai dude he is leaving why must you be such a arse all the time?

It is maybe not that he is an arse, it may be that he has to respond to anything, regardless of validity or and necessity. I have yet to figure it out completely.

And yes your reasons for leaving are completly true, Graal is just not fun because of every server being lame. Hopefully you find something usefull to entertain yourself with.

Damn my instinctive need to reply to what kai says....

Right there. If I say you might say "hi" is that also putting words into your mouth?


Perhaps any history you'd admit to, but even assuming you are right, history in no way decides present and future.

Was I the one that started this?

Yes.

You claim there is no correlation whatsoever?

"Those who control's the past, controls the present. Those who controls the present, controls the future"... History controls the present and future.

Kai -- Don't go into it.... It'll just get this thread shut down. It's not quite the right time to talk about unproven theories and possibilities.

As for the 'putting words in mouth', it's not quite... It's merely suggesting that you have a possibility of such outcome, as your words. It is simular to putting word's in gods mouth of how the universe was created. (No, I don't believe in god.) This would refer more to actually doing it: "Kaimetsu said 'Yes'". That would be considered putting words in your mouth if you hadn't said 'Yes.'

Kind of late, but good luck in the future!

Bye.

OMG

OMG

OMG

PLEASE STEWFU :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:

>_>

The phrase putting words into someone's mouth refers to something like "Now Kaimetsu will say Falco is wrong and that Kaimetsu is the godly king of arguing". However, what I did was more like "I think that Kaimetsu will have some sort of smartass remark here". Very different. You are wrong in this matter, please learn to live with it.

No, i claim that it cannot make a definite outcome, though it is possible that it COULD affect this, though I personally dont see it happening.

Why is it always "KAI DON'T ARGUE PLZ"? I'm not the only one here, and I didn't even start this thing.

Anybody that could type the second of those sentences has no right to talk about semantics.

It refers to any attempt to prescribe words to another person, which is what you did.

"make a definite outcome"? What are you talking about?

get a life

One like yours? Please god no.

Spending hours on end online trying to prove how smart you are must be much better. I ask God every day why I can't be more like you. Congratulations man on harassing someone 5+ years younger then you. What do you get for this amazing accomplishment? A cyber-pat on the back and more kids thinking you're a complete ass. CONGRATZ2UTHO

Than spending hours on end offline trying to prove how stupid you are? Yeah, probably.

See while earlier you got words put in your mouth you're just making things up now. You've proved time in and time out that you're pathetic and most of your posts are just trying to prove how superior you are to others. You know nothing about me offline, therefore you can't really say I try to prove I'm stupid. Good comeback though sweetums.

plz call me stupd plz or sey i am wste 0f lyf or sumthin plz

Bye bye.

Wow, this is like a dream, everyone against kai *tear*


Yes you did. I said what I expected, you could have just ignored it, or said you werent goign to say that, and nothign would have happened. Instead, you put actions into my fingers (i like that phrase, i think i'll start using it now...).


No, you're wrong, it means that you are saying someone wil lsay something. Voicing what one thinks someone will say is different.


event A and event B do not make event C what will definitely happen, or, the definite outcome.

PLZ

SHHH OMG >_> <_< :eek: x_x

FIND SUMTHIN BETTER 2 DO THAN R-GEW OVR ST00P1D STUFFS :confused: :mad: :megaeek:

No, he didn't. See > Next
There you go. You started "it."

No, he actually started the argument. Whoever responds to a statement in the way he did is the one who starts it.

Indeed? And what was the purpose of your initial post in this thread? The overall message seemed to be "IM COOLAR THEN U SO B LIEK ME".

How do I try to prove my superiority? Through arguing? You do that too. Through insulting people? You do it far more than I do - again, just look at your initial post.

Sure I do. You've talked about yourself before, and everything you've said has painted the picture of a generic nobody, too concerned about what other people think of him to develop his own sense of self.


That's a pretty idiotic argument. You can say whatever you want about a person and then - if they respond - accuse them of starting a fight because they could've ignored it?

I expect that you will say something stupid in response to this! But that's not an offensive statement, right? After all, you can ignore it.

You seem to be stuck in kind of a loop here.

Yeah, so? Did you notice that I used the word 'suggests'?

Also, do you really think I was seriously saying that you are always wrong?

Ignoring is one way to not start the fight. The other is "Actually, I wasn't planning on that". Simple. No real argumentive responses to that.


You were saying you were right each time (except for this), so you arent being any better.


Yes, but you said it in a way to make it look like history was all that you needed to say I was wrong here.
No, but it wouldnt surprise me if you did.

wait wait wait wait

I care about what others think of me? What the hell are you reading? I do what I want and have never once tried to fit in. Ever. You honestly have no idea who I am. I never said I don't insult people. I insult people I don't like, but I stick up for people too. You just seem to pick random kids to insult. If I knew how to bold things I'd bold KIDS. You are arguing against CHILDREN.

Haha. I don't think that's entirely accurate, but the point isn't particularly relevant, is it? You yourself earlier claimed that your online and offline personas are not identical - and now you're telling me that you mustn't seek approval offline since you don't do it online?

You didn't answer my point. You insult and argue just as I do. Does this mean that you too are constantly seeking to prove yourself superior? It works both ways, dawg.

Sometimes. Most of the people I argue with are within a few years of my age, so I don't really see your point. Even if your claim were accurate, what would it mean? Is there something inherently wrong with talking to people younger than you?

I don't really have much choice if you've already started it. Again: You feel that voicing expectations can never equate to starting an argument?

The problem is not that you claimed to be correct. The problem is this: That's all you did. Pure assertion, no real argument.

No, it was just a flippant comment. You're reading far too much into it.

well mayB we think UR flippant~! lolz

so n00b