Quote:
Originally posted by CyberWitness
1. My definition of spam is messages that don't have anything to do with the subject of the thread in quesiton.
|
Most posts in your thread were indeed related to your original post, or other posts in the thread.
It is usually the job of the moderation to decide what is spam and what is not, and when debating a topic you should just focus on the discussion instead of labelling other posts as spam.
Quote:
You last post didn't have much to do with my asking Stefen for help.
|
It was a valid response to another post. It might be slightly off topic, but the point of a forum thread is to develop, and I only reacted to your post, and you now react again.
Quote:
Instead, it was just you buchering up my posts to make me look bad.
|
I do not understand what is wrong with answering a post piece for piece. It is more structured and has, as far as I know, been the preferred form of answering quoted material since like ever.
I do not think that I am taking the things I respond to out of context.
Quote:
2. I understand that this is a public forum, but I'm just trying to get ahold of Stefen the only way I know of.
|
Well, if you post in a public forum you are basically asking for feedback. I think you are now aware that there is the option to send a private message to a forums user.
Quote:
I can't stop you from posting, but can we stick to the subbject instead of making each other look bad please?
|
As I said I am only responding to previous posts. It is your aggressive posting that is leading the thread away from its original topic.
Quote:
3. What offer for help? You mean when you said that because I made an angry face that you should help me if you have time after school? Come on, be serious.
|
Satrek told you to contact me, I posted that I would help you if I found the time, but I do not think you realized that.
I am serious. I am spending a lot of my free time to help people on GK, and although there are many cases where just nothing can be done due to lack of logs or other "evidence", I do think I am usually quite helpful.
Quote:
4. What's this forum called? 2002 Bugs. It's reserved for reporting bugs on Graal Kingdom.
|
If you want to interprete it as strictly, then you are abusing this forum for personal requests for helps and to contact other folks. You are hardly reporting a bug.
Quote:
If you want to debate something, go do it on another forum.
|
No. It is a forum. It is meant to debate bugs. It is meant for communication.
Quote:
5. I don't know what forum rules you're talking about.
|
That, of course, is a wonderful position to start an argument with.
There is an announcement forum which contains threads in which the super moderators post the rules.
Quote:
And 6. I know that the forums atomatically post your signature, but I wrote this as a business letter. I'm a customer who's upstet about this state of the product.
|
But this medium is very unlike letters. It is a discussion platform, not a messaging service. To write business letters, you should use email at least, and as Stefan does not use email you might want to use the support center. URL anyone?
Quote:
So I thought it would be more official to sign it.
|
With a nickname, sure
Quote:
But if you ask me, you just added that accusation in just to try to make me look bad. So cut it out.
|
Might be. I was perhaps exaggerating but my point was something along the lines of how you attempt to sound more official than the rest of us
Quote:
"Oh look at this! He signed his message! So je's dumb and I'm smarter!"
|
Please do not put quotes in my mouth.
This was not my intention, I am not trying to make you look bad, and I am not attacking your intelligence.