Quote:
Originally Posted by Twinny
Do remember: scripts are compiled into bytecode and as such, I'm sure they do not give a **** however you name them. To care about such little stupid things....
|
Of course the scripts don't care. If you'd read the thread instead of jumping in you'd notice the subject is about
personal preference. Not about how Graal cares about the names since it doesn't at all.
Maybe you don't mind your scripts looking bad but if I were to choose from:
"SysMsg".addmsg();
or
SysMsg.addmsg();
I would choose the second option considering it looks better, its the more proper way, and its not highlighted in neon pink. The second option is only possible in the case that your weapon/object name doesn't have funky symbols in it.
If you want to name your objects with funky symbols, fine, it will just make your script look a bit worse when its really unnecessary. If you take advantage of public functions that is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angel_Light
Organization is all point of view, same with styling and etc. This is a good example, I'll respect your guy's point of views and all, but I find it easier with my symbols. =P
|
Do you think about people other than yourself when you do that?