Quote:
Originally Posted by Waltz5
Ok... but again. You're trying to back it up with they'll pick good leaders yet point to the instability which was coorelated to the leaders picking? I don't follow.
And it was changed to having staff approve in the first place not that long ago. You say it's for the best, but what measures if any should be taken in your scenario to help prevent such problems.
|
Well actually, in light of Tig's post, I think everybody should be given a second chance. The only way staff should butt in is if someone breaks the rules while actually leading the kingdom. Not only does that influence others, it also triggers them to do it later to
jump on the band wagon, so to speak.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by schnukelmaus View Post
I believe everybody except the four people that voted no can come to that mutual consensus
|
I voted no. I think someoen else should because while encouraging roleplay is good the choice for the replacement may not be wise so in that case it is not good. Mutual would mean unspoken and you just spoke it....
|
I can see where your going with that, but I do not agree. My reason for disagreeing is that how do staff know who is good at RPing and who isn't? Staff never oversee RP events unless it is posted on the forums. The kingdom leaders would know who is best for the kingdom, either way.