![]() |
Re-make or make new?
This should be interesting.
You have a playerworld and a full team of dedicated developers. Would you re-make an old project, or would you make a new idea? |
Depends. I voted to remake, because there are some awesome playerworld projects which have died (for example, Sands of Glory died when it just needed a few changes).
|
Depends really.
There were some really good servers in the making, or that just were forgotten, but remakes have never gone well. |
originality! New one, afcourse!!
|
I personally couldn't imagine working on another playerworld project other then Mythic, so for good or bad, I'd chose with remake.
However, it generally depends on your server idea etc. - but in most cases I'd go for remake! |
Quote:
|
It looks like it's mostly split between both. Not that surprising, heh.
|
Make a new one. You'll get credited more.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
coughJIGGAcough |
Re-creating a server's advantage's:
Re-creating a server's disadvantage's:
Either way remaking or not is still a good idea. I would love to see some of the old dead servers revive, such as Maloria, or Babylon. |
Quote:
|
I say new. If anything, I would reuse an overworld of one of the many servers that have fallen into oblivion because it's one of the things I can't do on my own.
There are numerous problems when you reuse old content... most of the time you have to redo it all anyways. On the far end of the spectrum, people redo it to the point it's not recognizable and just slap the old servers name on it hoping to garner attention of those who loved it. If you're going to put that much effort into a server, why not simply make it your own? |
That's true Dusty.
If we decided to rename Vesporia to Sands of Glory (which Vesporia evolved from) we'd get a lot of publicity for a completely different server. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.