Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   PlayerWorlds Main Forum (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=15)
-   -   Re-make or make new? (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=79759)

Horrified 05-17-2008 04:50 PM

Re-make or make new?
 
This should be interesting.

You have a playerworld and a full team of dedicated developers. Would you re-make an old project, or would you make a new idea?

cbk1994 05-17-2008 04:51 PM

Depends. I voted to remake, because there are some awesome playerworld projects which have died (for example, Sands of Glory died when it just needed a few changes).

Darlene159 05-17-2008 05:35 PM

Depends really.
There were some really good servers in the making, or that just were forgotten, but remakes have never gone well.

Pimmeh 05-17-2008 05:36 PM

originality! New one, afcourse!!

xXziroXx 05-17-2008 11:04 PM

I personally couldn't imagine working on another playerworld project other then Mythic, so for good or bad, I'd chose with remake.

However, it generally depends on your server idea etc. - but in most cases I'd go for remake!

cbk1994 05-17-2008 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pimmeh (Post 1391238)
originality! New one, afcourse!!

But what if there was a great server that died due to lack of development staff? That good idea will never have a chance to flourish.

Horrified 05-18-2008 05:21 PM

It looks like it's mostly split between both. Not that surprising, heh.

MysticX2X 05-18-2008 07:17 PM

Make a new one. You'll get credited more.

cbk1994 05-18-2008 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MysticX2X (Post 1391428)
Make a new one. You'll get credited more.

It's not about credit :rolleyes:

Pimmeh 05-18-2008 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbk1994 (Post 1391430)
It's not about credit :rolleyes:

To most people it is...
coughJIGGAcough

Imperialistic 05-19-2008 12:52 AM

Re-creating a server's advantage's:
  • Finish what someone got started
  • Can save a lot of time
  • Bring back fun and good memories

Re-creating a server's disadvantage's:
  • Not get much credit (But who cares)
  • Confused on where to start

Either way remaking or not is still a good idea. I would love to see some of the old dead servers revive, such as Maloria, or Babylon.

Ziro_of_the_Turks 05-19-2008 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Imperialistic (Post 1391469)
Re-creating a server's disadvantage's:
  • Not get much credit (But who cares)
  • Confused on where to start

This may apply to "Confused on where to start", but it's still worth mentioning that another problem is people's differing views on what made the server so good. I'm assuming any recreation of a server is intended to not be exactly how it was, but rather preserve what's important, while making use of modern mechanics.

DustyPorViva 05-19-2008 01:27 AM

I say new. If anything, I would reuse an overworld of one of the many servers that have fallen into oblivion because it's one of the things I can't do on my own.
There are numerous problems when you reuse old content... most of the time you have to redo it all anyways. On the far end of the spectrum, people redo it to the point it's not recognizable and just slap the old servers name on it hoping to garner attention of those who loved it.

If you're going to put that much effort into a server, why not simply make it your own?

cbk1994 05-19-2008 01:32 AM

That's true Dusty.

If we decided to rename Vesporia to Sands of Glory (which Vesporia evolved from) we'd get a lot of publicity for a completely different server.

Horrified 05-20-2008 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbk1994 (Post 1391483)
That's true Dusty.

If we decided to rename Vesporia to Sands of Glory (which Vesporia evolved from) we'd get a lot of publicity for a completely different server.

Yeah, and all you'd ever get is 'well SoG was better here...' or so.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.