![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
He looks to see who negative reps him, then harasses them. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
As for whats wrong with it? You guys are MODS AND ADMINS you are supposed to be held to a higher standard then us players, yes that is a form of harassment if we arent allowed to call our friends *****s how come a SUPER MOD is allowed to call us Gutless? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Oh, and look up what harrassment is Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
In reply to you trying to justify Sam's corrupt actions, I have a question for you. Is it right for Sam to look to see who negative repped him, then pm them insulting them for it. It's immature and I expect you as the forum admin to deal with it and punish him in some way. Maybe he's not mature enough to be a super mod. Quote:
|
Quote:
That is the issue. Users being silenced along with their complaints in the support tickets. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
I think this is getting childish now... :/
|
A forum is an arena for communication and sense-making.
As defined by Google. |
Quote:
That's from when Spark911 and myself were testing the forum usergroup system a while back. |
I believe I had a thread about this...it's conveniently buried in Future Improvements somewhere. The Support Center should have very specific levels of complaint: general, supervisor, and Top-level. If you complain to Stefan that you lost your forum password, you should get in trouble and risk losing your access - that level should be reserved Only for emergencies (like how it's a $10,000 fine for abusing 911)...but the level should still exist. Similarly there should be an in-between level, for trusted admins to take care of corruption charges before Stefan has to stop development to step in...
Another thing - maybe the support center gets spammed with people trying to reach Stefan for matters other than corrupt admins? Maybe the support center should be specific: "Only post to Stefan or Unixmad if it's an emergency or you're reporting corruption in an admin that only reports to them; for any other matters, forum PM them [link]." I mean, it took me months and months to eke out how to get a response from Stefan nowadays...partially because, busy as he is, it takes months and months to Get a response. :-P Yet Another Thing - Forum Admin is a good idea. I'd even say Moonie should be promoted to it - and before those of you who dislike Moonie riot, hear me out - that way she'd be entitled to make decisions without Unixmad's permission, And responsible for her actions on the forums. If Sam goes around deleting your posts, Moonie would be responsible for reaching a resolution or liable for corruption in failing so to do. But maybe that would just make More paperwork for Unixmad. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
We believe something like a Forum Manager, or what Tyhm pointed out as a possible better solution to dealing with these problems. |
I usually hear "Unixmad" brought up for a excuse for the moderators reactions. Personally I don't think the Mods would act any different if Unixmad didn't enforce these "Laws". If they did, wouldn't they address the problem that his community constantly brings up to him illegal or not.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think that was unwarranted because I didnt say anything that was a personal attack. But im over it, its the only one ive ever gotten, so im not cryin still. |
You can't make everyone happy.
But how about aiming for the majority? |
Quote:
|
After reading through numberous posts I think the way Unixmad is blamed for all of this is what causes such stupid problems like "Anti-Unixmad". Unixmad is constantly being used as a scapegoat reason for problems on the forums to act as though some people are being forced by him to carry out his wishes. If you're going to do something, for god sake take responsibility for your own actions.
No wonder people turn Anti-Graal with attitudes like this. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Darlene only forwards tickets to unixmad if you're "harrassing her" or if she wants to get you threatened, I have proof.
|
Quote:
The way it is, you have to enforce rules whether you agree with them or not, and not even you are allowed to grant exceptions to these rules. You should either be granted the power to act in Unixmad's absence or we should get someone who can. |
Quote:
|
It's not like Moonie's a terrible mod it's more so like Infernix said she just kind of sits there and mods because unix says so and he should give her full reign over the forums then it would be more orderly and less confusion.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Yet, he never addresses them so he should give you some power to do something. O_O
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I am ashamed to know that a game Ive played for so many years has has gone so low in quality in so many levels compared to where it was before.
|
Quote:
She has not proven that she could handle "Full control" of the forums based upon just working on what unixmad says. Unixmad hardly uses the forums OR plays on graal client, it is his Buisness yes but look at it this way A man who owns Man Resteraunts will appoint a "General Manager" to each one who is allowed to act in the best interest of the Resteraunt which they represent. They do not come down to talk to or change things the General Manager does unless things are going VERY wrong (money loss, or something like that). The only people I could think fit this bill entirely would be Stefan and Ibonic, yet they are both more like Unixmad in that they are also not as involved as they could be. I think what graal needs is a positive "General Manager" (or Game Master if you will, someone besides Ibonic) who its their JOB to take care of everything. Nemesis had that job, and as much as I hate the guy, he actually did what he was supposed to very well (right up until that very nasty end). Same with Spark, but he was removed for Disagreeing (Dosent the General Manager report whats happening and try to help the Owner earn more profits?) What now? |
Quote:
And you deleted the threads before it was against the rules! Too Much Power |
Quote:
|
lmao. What the heck is he on about?
|
Quote:
Yet we weren't allowed to speak of our favorite alcoholic beverage. Then, you delete the thread, and take 'vast' out of the rule. It was fast, there was no way you talked to Unix that quickly. You can do whatever you want, and that's too much power. If you didn't enjoy having too much power, you wouldn't mind if it was limited a bit. |
Quote:
If I could do whatever I wanted, I would do so. I cannot do whatever I want, however. If Unixmad wants to limit me, more than I already am, I wouldn't mind at all. they are his forums. The little power I have means nothing to me. Honestly, you act like I control the internet. |
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.