lol i think my sig should work now

And how are you so sure that it does!!!

Can you yet provide some examples? Further, can you show how these examples change the fundamentals of moderation?

Kaimetsu and I both spend an inordinate amount of time at this forum. Just what is there that we can't see?

You posted something doofy, causing others to call you on it. What exactly is that influencing other than people's opinion of you?

You must really enjoy non sequitur.

Like what?

How? You're justifying a claim that things change by saying that things change. Stop begging the question.

You surely cannot be serious. Look it up, dude.

As Kaimetsu said, he can judge them based upon what he does see. There is enough that he has seen that they have not done (and, in some cases, something they have done that they should not have) for him to be able to do so.

lol to many post lol does sig work on classic servers?

thanks lance, i dont need to hear you repeat yourself over.

Yea the signature should work on every server you go to. There's no way to fix the "server is lagging" part, even in Loriel's script, it's just the graal page taking too long to download.

So you refuse, then, to justify your claims? How dull.

I refuse to continue to contradict your vicious dissection of every post I make. If you devote yourself to graal forums then so be it, but I have my own ambitions more worthwhile to handle than argue points against people I don't and never will know. You might find this important, but Graal is not my life and I really don't care what the outcome of your arguing is. My signature script is constructive and will help me practice my programming skills for later in life, if you want to comment on it then please do so, otherwise leave the topic on track.

thanks too all who helped me get the sig that shows if i'm on or not. :)

lol well if that script ever stops workin you're welcome to try mine ^^

While debating allows you to develop much-needed thinking skills.

Undeniably, but I'd rather debate over my real-life concerns than petty issues i'm rather unknowledgable upon. I'm not blaming anybody for debating at all, it's rather constructive, just becoming too much of a hassle to keep maintaining when I have little interest. Not to mention it's far from the original purpose of this topic.

You are not confident enough to support your statements, but you are confident enough to make them? Not a very sensible policy.

I gave you my supporting evidence repeatedly, which I still hold to be true. You and Lance turn this into a game of words more than addressing my point. Stop throwing my questions back at me and get to what you think. I say it's unfair to call moderators lazy because you don't know what they do. There's no possible way you could be 100% sure that you know everything that goes on, despite however much you know, even if you know 99% of the story. If you can't get to this point and want to keep weeding out specific phrases that look weak and avoid the main idea of my argument then I'm fighting against a machine and not a human. I expect my ideas to be heard, not each individual part of my sentence to be analyzed.

I want you to TELL me HOW you could possibly know EXACTLY what's happening, and how what you do know is enough to create the conclusion that ALL moderators are lazy due to unexcusable issues. Unless you live with the moderators, I'm afraid you can't possibly support that. I'd bet many of these people you are accusing of laziness you have never even seen a picture of, although I wouldn't know.

Here's a nice place for you to start.