![]() |
Quote:
::Runs off:: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
=X |
Graal 3.0 (C++ version) has been in the works for a bit. He's been testing it, and from all indications I have gotten, it seems as though it will be ready shortly, but don't quote me on that.
I know that Linux and Mac will have support for RC and Graal, as he was testing the MACGraal one day I believe and said it was working. ---Shifter |
Yeah VIPs were given a date. Although problems came up, so it was delayed a bit.
|
Quote:
=X the closest i have seen was the guild management, when they said March 1st (i think), because they were only 1 day late that time =x yet again, they STILL haven't added the edit member info section.... but lets not get into that here ;) |
Quote:
Now if we were really very important people, we would get updated estimates once the previously mentioned dates were passed. But the true VIP's are those who work with stefan on debug from what I hear. They are the one's getting the choice info. Perhaps I should try out? What are the qualifications? |
Well there have been many testers for 3D. Apparently all VIPs got a chance to help out, I didnt get asked!?
|
Quote:
|
From what Stefan told me today hes hopeing graal 3.0 will be out for VIPs by next week be he wasn't totaly sure about it.
|
Quote:
Qualifications? Just be skilled at something...useful to the crew heh. |
Uhh.. you subscribe for a VIP membership.... and you reallly don't get anything special.
|
thats why i am waiting for something solid.
|
Quote:
|
I didn't read all the posts but when are you guys gonna start letting people send in servers to get rated? I really want to see Everworld up.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
so the hireing of a PWA shouldn't effect EW... besides it giving Nem more time to look over the server i guess |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Blah, I don't like this at all, playerworlds should be kept up by Graal, and run by the players, they're supposed to be our worlds that be update and stuff...oh well.
I hope that it will be something like 10 dollars a month, however I doubt that will happen. I hope it's no more than 20 dollars a month, because more is really expensive, I don't see how we are going to possibly pay for this. There are a lot of playerworlds that should get up but wouldn't if it were to be too expensive...just keep that in mind. ________________________________ But, my main question is that will playerworlds still have to pass the same kinds of qualifications as the current ones? Will the standard for the required quality of the levels, scripting, and quality over-all of the applying playerworlds be less than previously? I think that would be really bad...playerworlds will still have to be just as good right? _________________________________ Also, I personally don't think it would be fair for current playerworlds to not have to pay...although maybe it would because I wouldn't like to see them taken down :( .....well most of them :p .... |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Well that’s what I think anyway, it will become clearer when Unix publishes he plans to everyone. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You know full well that it is difficult to find good staff now, and I am in the process of changing all the gif's on the levels to png/mng's before I move on to something else. they dont benefit from Management? You know nothing about this..... You and your stupid little know it all comments piss me off to no end....you know absolutely nothing about Npulse or the way it is run. :mad: |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
I don't think Stefan would "lose very little" if he closed all the playerworlds. A lot of people just play 1 pw. I started playing Graal on N-Pulse, and I hated everything else. If it was closed, I would have stopped playing. I don't know how many other people would do the same, but closing a PW -> large possibility of losing the people who play that PW. Yes, they might just go onto another one, but they would feel bad that they lost everything they worked for & that they would have to go learn the ways of another PW.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I already gave one alternative. I'll give another: Appoint somebody who doesn't mind about paying to manage the world. Somebody who realises that they get far more out of the deal than Graal does. |
Quote:
Managers get far more than Graal does? Maybe in some ways. Whether you want to admit it or not, these PW's are bringing money in for Graal, some more than others, but they are bringing it in. If they were shut down, Graal would lose alot of money. sue me if sometimes I think Managers are taken advantage of and not appreciated |
You haven't yet answered my question, but no matter.
The reality is that a management position isn't really work. To most people it's a desirable position of power and status, like a trophy of sorts. Yes, playerworlds bring something to Graal. They provide places where cheapskate players can spend their time, but they don't need managers to do that. |
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.