cursor problems
 

Thinking of graal 3, my dads pc doesnt seem to do the graal 3 cursor correctly, i.e. it doesnt move until a second or two after, almost a latency. Yet it works fine on my pc. Should Stefan want to do anything about it (:rolleyes:) the graphics card is a RIVA TNT2 and the mouse is a Microsoft Optical Wheelmouse.

No offense stefan the new graal client looks horrible i mean using the old background and such in the gui isnt mixing to well and as everyone knows the new client which is intended to be superior is by far inferior!

Nice job bringing back a dead topic and posting something way off topic o.O!

Shut up...he did nothing wrong.

What i just said is what he did wrong..

Uh...no...The thread is not that old, there's no rule against reviving threads, and what he said was related (though not exactly the same topic) to what is being discussed. Therefore, you have no right to flame him and you further present yourself as a person below average intelligence.

Subjective - A month can be a long time in certain forums; however, it is not quite so long in this one so much as the others.

It is highly frowned upon.

When somebody revives a thread, one would hope they would post something that is actually on the same topic as the original thread.

Crono did not flame Skyld, merely point out that his post was unnecessary, off topic, and went against the general idea that it's bad to revive threads.

You insult his intelligence, yet you, yourself, did not think before posting. Tsk.

You know what Tseng? You should really get off the rag man. You've been nothing but a pompous ******* for a while now on here. I wasn't even talking about Sky...I was talking about Nova's post because it was directly above Gerami's. I didn't even see Sky's post. No one said a damned thing to you yet you feel the need to but in on anything and everything. Go back to your cave and script for G2k1.

Oh, I see. You tried to look smart and failed miserably when I cut you down to size, so therefore you resort to petty insults. I laugh at you, sir. :p

Nova did not revive the thread, Skyld did - Look before you post!

Additionally, your comment on what is or is not a forum rule, having little backing earlier, has even less now, when you clearly violate all sorts of rules by those fun obscenities and insults!

No, I'm just tired of your holier than thou attitude towards me and everyone else here that says something you don't agree with.



I did sir. Sky was the original reviver yes, but Nova's post was 7 days after his post, soI thought that Gerami was talking about Nova.


All sorts of rules? I can think of maybe 2 at the most that my post broke, and that's even kind of pushing it considering I was provoked. Besides, since you can clearly read the forums rules at any time you choose, I did not feel the need to "back up" my claim that there is no rule against reviving threads.

Did you happen to read at least 4 of your last 5 posts? And you say I have a holier-than-thou attitude? Bahahaha. You amuse me.

*nod*

Two broken rules are two more than should exist. :)

Poor excuse. With this same logic, if I were "provoked," I could lay into you with all sorts of insults, and me being provoked would exuse it? Hardly.

You missed the point. I was pointing out that your flagrant disregard for certain rules is an impedement to your ability to make judgement calls of what is or is not a violation of forum rules.

And now to tear apart your original post...



1. The last post before sky's was less than a month old. Nova's post was 7 says after Sky's.
2. Lots of things are subjective, so what?




And why is that? You can't honestly say that everyone in the entire community hates when threads are revived. In Sky's case, what he said was not entirely relevent, but he felt the need to say something. But again, I was defending Nova and not Sky. Wait, look, you made a subjective statement too! :p



Perhaps so but I feel if someone has something they feel is important enough to post, they should be allowed to as long as they stay within the rules.



If he was indeed referring to Sky's post then yes. You've assumed that he was as he never stated whom he was referring to. Taking that into consideration my posts were valid considering that I thought he was referring to someone else. Yes, I also made an assumption, and perhaps it wasn't the best one, but the reason I did was because the post directly above his by Nova also "revived" the thread. Boo ya!

This is what provoked my earlier post. You throw a cheap shot at me, then I return fire. Which also means you initiated a flame war. :)

Anyway, retort all you will, I will no longer reply.

Its highly frowned upon to be rude and acting more intellegent than someone because you are not. Picking fights is frowned on alot more than reviving threads that the issue still exists and is on topic. So sir plz S.T.F.U.

I agree... kill the OS themes... they don't look good... an option disabling themes is something I would run with, though.