I'm sure the point of this is to hire people who are more of a GLOBAL graal player... the people who are known on all PWs, and go around to them all... if you've only played 1 or 2 PWs your whole graal life, then you aren't really an experienced player, because you don't have experiences on them all.

Like when you review a server... you have to compare it to ALL the other servers, to see if it's up to quality... but if you have never played more than 2 servers, you don't have the experience to judge the quality of this new PW.... you also wouldn't know if they stole things from other PWs, because you don't play them...

I (for example) have not really played many other servers besides n-pulse... but then again, for the past 2 years, i have server hopped, and talked to people on almost every server there is... so now, i am friends with the admins, and owners there... Sure, i haven't played them all for hundreds of hours, but i've walked around them, and i know the people there...

anyways, to make it short, they are looking for GLOBAL staff, so they need someone who's been around to all the servers, and doesn't just sit on 1 server all day...

Who are you replying to?

I might add this too, (something to think about and comment on)
Would if an Admin (current) was fired from another server for lets say hacking or abusive conduct , is this person STILL able to be a PWA?? I think that too needs to be considered that the person in question is an upstanding member of the Graal community and has never stooped to corruption or anything that will bring a bad name to Graal.Too many times people are hired from another server because they don't know the past history of the person and what they may have done somewhere else. I think this must NOT happen in the PWA , backgrounds need to be checked very carefully and if it can be proved without a doubt that they have had some misconduct on Graal , then they need to be removed from consideration. This is my thoughts on this, anyone else care to comment on this?

I agree if they've been banned or caught doing stuff from a server for any reasons that violate the EULA then they should automatically be disqualified. How ever in some cases such as being banned on Val for having a non-RP name shouldnt count etc..

lol. Well this is kinda funny. How many people been jailed/banned from Valikorlia. haha. Well it's certainly something to think about.

Are they all eliminated?

I agree that would be kinda silly, besides I think that is dumb to start with. Wouldn't it be better for them to go into some ghost mode till they made an appropriate nick? Banning for a nick that is not a RP name will only run players off.

umm... i was replying to Christian, and also making a general statment :rolleyes:

and MG, lets not get off topic here
;)

Has to be a server with over 10 players. They will be verified.
just get 10 friends to go on the server or something and take a snapshot haha

No need to roll your eyes, I didnt know who you were talking too...how did MG go off topic?
Seems to me he was replying to someone else who went off topic...if you are going to "warn" someone, at least warn the right person, thanks

i can roll my eyes when i want :rolleyes:


and the person MG replied to was not going off topic... that guy said that if you are banned on Val for not having an RP name, it shouldn't count against you, because that's not really anything that bad... then MG went off topic, and started talking about why would you be banned on Val just for your name... see what i mean?

and when did i "warn" someone :confused:

chill out, and relax :asleep:

I don't like this recomendation thing the way it is set up. You should get two recomendations from the manager of High Admin of two different servers. This will be a paragraph explaining to Nemesis why they think that the person they are supporting is good for the job and how they will represent the community.

I mean, because you got people with alot of friends on different servers, such as Loriel. He got 5 supporters. He doesn't even play Classic Playerworlds often, or at all.

This should be used for a "tie-breaker", it should be a mandatory thing. It is for all resumes' just about.

Please people read what Nemesis said. The 5 supports are just a tie break. The thing that will be the most important will be the 2 paragraphs. Nemesis will judge the ability of writting and organizing the ideas of the person.

Forum is not the best way to choose someone from. I think that the 5 supports thing is very good and efective.

I dont think you are reading what we say. We understand it is a "tie-breaker" thing, but it is still wrong to do it that way.