Any chance... - Page 2

cbk1994 · #16 08-15-2010, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KrimsonSky

But players can't run stuff remember, all bout them NPCs, gg.

You seem to be contradicting yourself ...?

KrimsonSky · #17 08-15-2010, 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbk1994

You seem to be contradicting yourself ...?

/sarcasm

run41 · #18 08-16-2010, 04:04 AM

Krims right.
Btw, im almost back dude!
Iloveyouboyfrieeend <3

jkldogg · #19 08-16-2010, 05:55 AM

So what had happened was.......
killaz (ya i kno we own) and like 6 other parties allied up and took over BH for like 20 minutes so Frankie cried and took off party allying cuz he said something like

"wow this is stupid, whoever made party allying is retared. parties shouldn't be able to overrun gang bases."

???
Why don't you make the gangs better or stronger in some way? Not my fault they get owned. o.o

EDIT: Krim sell me your Purple Noland on Era like 15k?

Frankie · #20 08-16-2010, 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jkldogg

So what had happened was.......
killaz (ya i kno we own) and like 6 other parties allied up and took over BH for like 20 minutes so Frankie cried and took off party allying cuz he said something like

"wow this is stupid, whoever made party allying is retared. parties shouldn't be able to overrun gang bases."

???
Why don't you make the gangs better or stronger in some way? Not my fault they get owned. o.o

EDIT: Krim sell me your Purple Noland on Era like 15k?

okay, so if I could go back in time, I would have totally just made people in gangs to 3 times the damage to people in parties. there, problem solved. I'm sure you would have been a happy camper. shut up.

cbk1994 · #21 08-16-2010, 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie

okay, so if I could go back in time, I would have totally just made people in gangs to 3 times the damage to people in parties. there, problem solved. I'm sure you would have been a happy camper. shut up.

you'd probably still get owned
ctrl v

maximus_asinus · #22 08-16-2010, 07:25 AM

Why not remove gangs and expand the party system, it sounds like it would have more potential. Build parties like a guild/gang. Allow players to partner up, and if their party reaches a certain threshold it becomes a gang (activity, party size, etc) and have it lose gang status once it starts to fail requirements. Parties can absorb other parties if the leader of the other party accepts. You cannot be in a party if you're already in a party already (to keep from multiguilding).

Fulg0reSama · #23 08-16-2010, 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maximus_asinus

Why not remove gangs and expand the party system, it sounds like it would have more potential. Build parties like a guild/gang. Allow players to partner up, and if their party reaches a certain threshold it becomes a gang (activity, party size, etc) and have it lose gang status once it starts to fail requirements. Parties can absorb other parties if the leader of the other party accepts. You cannot be in a party if you're already in a party already (to keep from multiguilding).

I support this idea.

jkldogg · #24 08-16-2010, 08:23 AM

@ max sales was gonna do that...when he resigned the idea died
@ frankie.....QQ more? umad

ya i support ur idea max

xTcDiabloxTc · #25 08-16-2010, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maximus_asinus

Why not remove gangs and expand the party system, it sounds like it would have more potential. Build parties like a guild/gang. Allow players to partner up, and if their party reaches a certain threshold it becomes a gang (activity, party size, etc) and have it lose gang status once it starts to fail requirements. Parties can absorb other parties if the leader of the other party accepts. You cannot be in a party if you're already in a party already (to keep from multiguilding).

Similar Idea to what I've been working on. Would post full details but I'd rather work out the kinks first. And of course, I don't like being quoted on it when things can still change

.

jkldogg · #26 08-16-2010, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xTcDiabloxTc

Similar Idea to what I've been working on. Would post full details but I'd rather work out the kinks first. And of course, I don't like being quoted on it when things can still change

.

no secrets :[

xTcDiabloxTc · #27 08-16-2010, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jkldogg

no secrets :[

I'm not trying to keep secrets, It'll be unveiled when it's ready for the public eye. I'd prefer to make an announcement when I have it all prepared.

Frankie · #28 08-16-2010, 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jkldogg

@ frankie.....QQ more? umad

you're the one *****ing about it bro.

Venom_Fish · #29 08-16-2010, 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xTcDiabloxTc

Similar Idea to what I've been working on. Would post full details but I'd rather work out the kinks first. And of course, I don't like being quoted on it when things can still change

.

Thats very original of you. You're a creative fellow, no one ever thought of that =o!

KrimsonSky · #30 08-16-2010, 06:13 PM

Hmm,

Reset the gangs,
Expand the party system's capabilities,
Let rich people purchase gangs.

but i know, LAT's will actually have to make more bases.../shocked this would be a nightmare ,
even though I'd offer to make bases in my sleep.