Any chance...

[KrimsonSky]

..of bringing /partyaddally back ?

I wouldn't even mind if it was a 1 ally limit, I miss that function.

[papajchris]

The reason for it being removed as i recall was that parties were allying up and practicably turning into gangs. Even one ally party makes you a gang as if you had both parties on you would have more members on than a gang averagely does

[Supaman771]

But you need a free oped gun and at least a 2 level no-pk base with speaker and hat grabbers to be a gang.

[KrimsonSky]

So what, being Gold [i.e paying for Graal], you should get the full experience.

If that means getting blown off by Gangs, and you want to have some party's with friends, so what ?

Clearly if you're party + allys are better then the gang itself, then that should push Gang leaders to recruit more members, more members more points more fun.

Not enough kids are on gang tags anyways.

[Frankie]

Originally Posted by KrimsonSky

So what, being Gold [i.e paying for Graal], you should get the full experience.

that's your argument? really? :P

[salesman]

The idea was to limit parties so people would be more inclined join gangs. There wasn't much to separate a gang from a party at that time, and people were just allying parties instead of joining gangs -- which wasn't the purpose of parties.

There's a few new perks that gangs have over parties now, so I guess it could be cool to re-add allying. I'd say limit the number of allies to one or two though.

[DDynasty]

It's a good idea but also make it so if a party is already allied noone else can ally them

[Spikedude]

Instead of bringing back allied parties, why not just make the party limit bigger?

[LordSquirt]

why not join a gang together

[Nataxo]

Originally Posted by papajchris

The reason for it being removed as i recall was that parties were allying up and practicably turning into gangs. Even one ally party makes you a gang as if you had both parties on you would have more members on than a gang averagely does

Everything should be like that IMO.

[Andre2006]

Bring forward the idea to purchase "gangs" already and remove parties. We want to purchase our own "gangs" or parties or whatever they were.

[KrimsonSky]

Originally Posted by Spikedude

Instead of bringing back allied parties, why not just make the party limit bigger?

Because 2 party names is better then 1.

[KrimsonSky]

Originally Posted by Andre2006

Bring forward the idea to purchase "gangs" already and remove parties. We want to purchase our own "gangs" or parties or whatever they were.

That is a great idea, but then the Gang Admin would have to do a decent amount of work, and you know how this story goes :[

[cbk1994]

Originally Posted by KrimsonSky

That is a great idea, but then the Gang Admin would have to do a decent amount of work, and you know how this story goes :[

The whole idea behind it is that the gang admin would have to do 0 work and everything is run by players

[KrimsonSky]

Originally Posted by cbk1994

The whole idea behind it is that the gang admin would have to do 0 work and everything is run by players

But players can't run stuff remember, all bout them NPCs, gg.