Harrasement and Locks

[Horrified]

Originally Posted by seanthien

You think zone players are very smart don't you? Well it's quite the other way around. Zone is like, anti social place,filled with not so smart people.:3

Respect? It's more of fear of bearing locked,they'd do it anway.You haven't seen a zone player when they don't like a staff have you?''zomg fk noob staff. u don no nuttin i report u''

so why bother having spy if they'd do it anyway in front of an ET?

[Dante55555]

Originally Posted by jkool666

Alright, one thing I've noticed a lot lately is problems elevating from locks and harrasement.

Harrasement is against the rules, and if you harrase other players you will be punished. Usually I freeze the player on CTF, and explain to them they are breaking the rules and if they continue they will be locked. And then I let them go, follow them around for a bit and if they improve I leave them alone. But then most players flip out and swear at me, which is obviously expected.

I want to try and explain something to you:
The more you swear, over react and flip out at a staff member, the more you lose. If you stay calm, recieve their talk and no-longer harrase others you will not be locked.
Now if you are locked, deal with it... its an hour, go outside or something. Again if you flip out about a lock you will only recieve a longer one.

..or a neat little 3 day ban =)

[pooper200000]

Anyone else find it ironic that the only non staff to post in this thread are horrified and sean lol?

Edit: Not to say they can't it is just funyn that no one else posted.

[UnknownMasterMind]

I like the idea of invisibility but not really for this certain situation, I would like it for Events, and when Invisible, I think people should walk threw you also. For Events, you could use this to find teamers, hiders, and healers(in battle, I read some of your rules.). But for abuse reasons should only be enabled for Deathmatch. The invisibility with harassment, would kinda be abused, and could lead to invasion of privacy, i.e. maybe a Boy, and a G.I.R.L.(Guy in real life) are talking to each other, and a invisible ET listens to the whole conversation for their enjoyment. (For you dirty minded people, its a regular conversation, and for hypothetical purposes lets say its about, what they did last Thursday on thanksgiving.)

[seanthien]

Originally Posted by pooper200000

Anyone else find it ironic that the only non staff to post in this thread are horrified and sean lol?

Edit: Not to say they can't it is just funyn that no one else posted.

That means, you need to hire sean. :3 Horrified doesn't play zone, so psh.

Originally Posted by UnknownMasterMind

I like the idea of invisibility but not really for this certain situation, I would like it for Events, and when Invisible, I think people should walk threw you also. For Events, you could use this to find teamers, hiders, and healers(in battle, I read some of your rules.). But for abuse reasons should only be enabled for Deathmatch. The invisibility with harassment, would kinda be abused, and could lead to invasion of privacy, i.e. maybe a Boy, and a G.I.R.L.(Guy in real life) are talking to each other, and a invisible ET listens to the whole conversation for their enjoyment. (For you dirty minded people, its a regular conversation, and for hypothetical purposes lets say its about, what they did last Thursday on thanksgiving.)

Ya i guess it would.. but hey, if its a private convo they can take it to something like pms,msn or something

[Huwajux]

Originally Posted by anubis_wing

He means me, Huwajux has a very, very low of me. It sucks :[

A very low what?

[anubis_wing]

Opinion, I don't know why it didn't put it in.

Anyways, I don't see how you could invade on a private conversation, if you want to talk it private do it over *private* message.

[Frieza]

Originally Posted by pooper200000

Anyone else find it ironic that the only non staff to post in this thread are horrified and sean lol?

Edit: Not to say they can't it is just funyn that no one else posted.

not anymore!

3 words: zone needs a jail XD

[Huwajux]

Originally Posted by Frieza

3 words: zone needs a jail XD

...

[Crow]

Originally Posted by Frieza

3 words: zone needs a jail XD :)

Originally Posted by Huwajux

...

LOL! Thats so awesome :D

[Ravenblade1979]

I doubt being invisible will do any good. If people start getting caught for stuff they will complain that they were setup and stuff by the ET regardless of the fact they actually did it.

[Frieza]

Originally Posted by Ravenblade1979

I doubt being invisible will do any good. If people start getting caught for stuff they will complain that they were setup and stuff by the ET regardless of the fact they actually did it.

now THATS intelligence!

[Switch]

Originally Posted by Frieza

3 words: zone needs a jail XD

I already proposed the idea..

[UnknownMasterMind]

As things are looking, it is a good idea, but there are many positive, and negatives as always, so I would like to ask when we will make the final decision of whether it should be added or not.

[seanthien]

Originally Posted by Switch

I already proposed the idea..

Jail was suposed to be made like, a long time ago O.o.It was ''finished'' but never added I guess. Just like sniper. :3

Originally Posted by UnknownMasterMind

As things are looking, it is a good idea, but there are many positive, and negatives as always, so I would like to ask when we will make the final decision of whether it should be added or not.

Yes, I want to know to. Rather sean should be added as et or not. (Waits for people to flame him and be like ''lolololno'')

Originally Posted by Ravenblade1979

Anubis it is....invisible would probably extend to radar as well. They could say you set them up and unless you had a screenie that you were there..well then you weren't really there were you? At least thats what they would argue

That's like saying lock will be abuse. :3, You're overthinking it.

But there are other negatives.