delete npulse/classic and move its good content to UN

[kia345]

Originally Posted by Exhausted

yeah.. an idea to get rid of the servers with little to no betters for the betterment of the servers that actually have players is a flat-out ridiculous idea *rolls eyes*

How about we get rid of the servers that don't have the development team to make their own decent content?

[Hiro]

Originally Posted by kia345

How about we get rid of the servers that don't have the development team to make their own decent content?

define "decent content" then

[Exhausted]

Originally Posted by Nelm

It's the job of the current classic tabbed servers' management to supply their server with a staff capable of bettering their own server, not taking the best things from other servers that have a low player count.

The things on Classic/N-Pulse/Delteria have all been worked on hard by their respective staff members and the content on these servers belongs to the server, not to other servers who want a cheap way to add new content. This idea of deleting servers and giving away their content, which they painstakingly created, is ludicrous.

Removing these servers and giving away their content to another undeserving server is not going increase player count. The problem with player count has more to do with the actual game itself and it's various issues than any of the servers.

which playercount? graal's overall playercount or the server's playercount? each server has their own things that make the server fun, already.. just for some reason certain servers (Classic/npulse/delteria) have deteriorated over the years, so it only makes sense to remove them and give their content to servers that actually are living

Originally Posted by Darlene159

How is getting rid of playerworlds with few players going to better anything? The players will still be spread out like they are. There are players waiting for a better Classic, N-Pulse, and Delteria. Your idea would not make a recognizable difference.

yes it would. the servers given new content would be a lot better. they've been waiting for a better classic for how long? better npulse for how long? better delteria for how long? when is it time to pull the plug?

Originally Posted by Darlene159

You missed my point. If these playerworlds have hardly no players, it wont make much of a difference.

npulse has a small playercount.. if the server was deleted, it'd add 10-20 players to other servers. delteria usually has a few, and classic does too. their playercounts can never compete with UN/Era/Zod anymore.. even Valikorlia has more players then npulse/classic/delteria which is really really sad and proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the servers are finished

Originally Posted by kia345

How about we get rid of the servers that don't have the development team to make their own decent content?

they can make their own content.. i'm just saying, deleting the useless servers for the advancement of the good ones is only a great idea.

once again there's a reason some servers have 'high' playercounts and others don't.

[Hiro]

Originally Posted by Exhausted

which playercount? graal's overall playercount or the server's playercount? each server has their own things that make the server fun, already.. just for some reason certain servers (Classic/npulse/delteria) have deteriorated over the years, so it only makes sense to remove them and give their content to servers that actually are living

npulse has a small playercount.. if the server was deleted, it'd add 10-20 players to other servers. delteria usually has a few, and classic does too. their playercounts can never compete with UN/Era/Zod anymore.. even Valikorlia has more players then npulse/classic/delteria which is really really sad and proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the servers are finished


they can make their own content.. i'm just saying, deleting the useless servers for the advancement of the good ones is only a great idea.

you are living in a fantasy world. let me enlighten you on a few things:

1) removing a playerworld and ten having another playerworld take over their "good" content is still basically stealing. i doubt any of the current managers would like to have all of their content moved onto a server they probably don't like or even play

2) if you deleted npulse and other playerworlds, it wouldn't add any number of players to another server. those players would just quit because now their home server is gone. they play those servers for a reason

3)"deleting the useless servers for the advancement of the good ones is only a great idea." so let's take this same sentence and put it into a different context:

"closing down useless businesses and other business venues for the advancement of monopolies for good companies is only a great idea."

or how about,

"closing down useless hospitals and other ET places in the community for the advancement of the good hospitals is only a great idea."

one more?

"closing down useless schools and other education services for the advancement of good schools is only a great idea."

i mean seriously, think before you write something as ignorant as that down and post it. it's plain stupid for my examples, and for graal

[DustyPorViva]

What makes anyone so sure deleting a server will mean players will just magically move to the next? If those players liked the other servers, wouldn't that mean they'd be there in the first place?

[Rufus]

Originally Posted by DustyPorViva

What makes anyone so sure deleting a server will mean players will just magically move to the next? If those players liked the other servers, wouldn't that mean they'd be there in the first place?

Classic went down and the majority of those regular players are now on UN.

[Nataxo]

I dont support this idea.

Has to be a better solution.

[DustyPorViva]

Originally Posted by Rufus

Classic went down and the majority of those regular players are now on UN.

Ya, but didn't they leave on their own will before it was ever thrown UC?

[Exhausted]

Originally Posted by Hiro

you are living in a fantasy world. let me enlighten you on a few things:

1) removing a playerworld and ten having another playerworld take over their "good" content is still basically stealing. i doubt any of the current managers would like to have all of their content moved onto a server they probably don't like or even play

all content uploaded is technically the property of Graalonline. if stefan/unix agree with my idea they can do whatever they please.

2) if you deleted npulse and other playerworlds, it wouldn't add any number of players to another server. those players would just quit because now their home server is gone. they play those servers for a reason

losing npulse's/classic's/other useless server's players isn't really that big of a lost.. the reward would outweigh the risk in this situation.. how can you prove they'd quit anyway?

3)

LOL you call my ideas ****ty but here you are comparing graal servers to irl businesses. moving along..

i mean seriously, think before you write something as ignorant as that down and post it. it's plain stupid for my examples, and for graal

your examples are irrelevant to anything

Originally Posted by Nataxo

I dont support this idea.

Has to be a better solution.

lol aren't you a trial?

Edit: btw Hiro, i rate your trolling a 1.4/10

[Crono]

Originally Posted by Exhausted

LOL you call my ideas ****ty but here you are comparing graal servers to irl businesses. moving along..

It's called an analogy, and no one is surprised you didn't get it.

[Exhausted]

i did get it. comparing dead/dying graal servers and irl establishments is just silly.

[Nelm]

It's about as silly as saying that "dead/dying" servers should be deleted and their content should be given away to UN.

How about UN continues to develop their own, original content? Sounds good to me.

[Exhausted]

UN does develop their own original content and will continue to do so.

All of the servers I refer to have failed and probably will fail even more despite their huge "REBIRTH" attempts. Whenever these servers finally have zero players for good and everything is removed from the game entirely, it would just have been a huge waste, but if their content is moved to UN (or Val's to Zodiac) and they'd still be some use for it.

Everyone in this thread insults my idea while their own rebuttles are just silly (for the most part) and only disagree with it because they love the server even they barely play anymore

And seriously, look at these stupid negative reputation points I'm getting...

delete npulse/classic... 07-01-2009 11:03 PM Your such a mog
delete npulse/classic... 07-01-2009 01:49 PM noob
delete npulse/classic... 07-01-2009 08:12 AM >
delete npulse/classic... 06-30-2009 07:14 PM Now I understand why your rep is red.
delete npulse/classic... 06-30-2009 03:41 PM god your so stupid LOL

Calling a religious figure stupid is going way too far.

[Nelm]

I am well aware that UN develops their own content and will continue to do so. That's exactly why they don't need to have anyone else's content given to them. The team at UN is capable of creating new, original content on it's own. Adding in recycled levels, scripts, and NPCs from other servers is not going to improve UN because we have already seen all of this stuff before.

Graal needs creativity, not rehashes, or even worse in this case, complete rips from other servers. In no way, shape, or form does this idea improve Graal overall or UN as a server. And to be honest, if this ever happened I would stop playing whatever server took said dying server's content.

Your idea isn't even good to begin with so saying that others are replying with horrible rebuttals is like the pot calling the kettle black. This thread is well deserving of negative rep. So, after I'm done writing this I'll follow suit by neg-ing your rep.

Seriously...if these servers die, let them die in peace. There's no need for UN (or any other server for that matter) to take their content because as you previously said, they are fully capable of creating their own content.

P.S. Said religious figure would have a capital G, not lowercase.

[Exhausted]

Originally Posted by Nelm

I am well aware that UN develops their own content and will continue to do so. That's exactly why they don't need to have anyone else's content given to them. The team at UN is capable of creating new, original content on it's own. Adding in recycled levels, scripts, and NPCs from other servers is not going to improve UN because we have already seen all of this stuff before.

Any server having a great wealth of graphics, scripts, etc, could benefit greatly from them. If anything, UN could make an Island called "Classic Island" (I'm bad with names) or something and have some of the servers main levels w/ it's activities (similar to Isle of Bane) and players could go to that island when they please.

I can't believe you think UN couldn't benefit from it... fowlplay4 (Manager of Zod) even said earlier he'd love to have a ton of graphics and such.

Graal needs creativity, not rehashes, or even worse in this case, complete rips from other servers. In no way, shape, or form does this idea improve Graal overall or UN as a server. And to be honest, if this ever happened I would stop playing whatever server took said dying server's content.

UN has creativity, which is why they are working on their own things. In no way would it negatively affect the server itself to have new things. Who cares if you quit?

This thread is well deserving of negative rep. So, after I'm done writing this I'll follow suit by neg-ing your rep

You act like I care if I get negative reputation points by someone who doesn't even have the slightest clue on what would improve the game or not.

Seriously...if these servers die, let them die in peace. There's no need for UN (or any other server for that matter) to take their content because as you previously said, they are fully capable of creating their own content.

Why should the dead server's content go to waste? Old Delteria has nice events that could replace some of UN's or add onto their events.

P.S. Said religious figure would have a capital G, not lowercase.

*rolls eyes* Didn't you see the rest of his comment had poor grammar?