The next Graal client

[DustyPorViva]

Originally Posted by coreys

A little behind on that one, aren't you? (Not suggesting going up to DX10 or 11, because those are only on Vista and 7 and I doubt they have much, if any, more support for 2D graphics than DX9)

I'd like to see a more fine grained, built in updating service in the client so that we don't have to until some big new client version to get bug fixes and quick updates. So that you can do small, incremental patches very often. It's not even particularly difficult to achieve, coding-wise.

Pretty much every online game I've ever played does this - they make small updates regularly, weekly even (in some cases). I understand it taking three years to get done with all the changes going into v6, what I don't understand is why you have wait until it's all done before releasing updates (especially the bug fixes).

The update process has nothing to do with why we're waiting for big updates. Updating the client earlier was as easy as going to the downloads package and clicking update(as far as I remember, I could be wrong...). I'm not sure why he ditched micro-updates, but I hate it so much. We shouldn't have to wait years just to get small bug fixes.

[coreys]

Originally Posted by DustyPorViva

I'm not sure why he ditched micro-updates, but I hate it so much. We shouldn't have to wait years just to get small bug fixes.

Well, ideally, for him it should be as simple as compiling a new binary, testing it out, and hitting a button (metaphorically) to upload it to an update server; then when someone logs into the client it would automatically update. Not that it has to work this way, it just should.

[DustyPorViva]

Originally Posted by coreys

Well, ideally, for him it should be as simple as compiling a new binary, testing it out, and hitting a button (metaphorically) to upload it to an update server; then when someone logs into the client it would automatically update. Not that it has to work this way, it just should.

I think the rumor was he got tired of compiling the smaller updates. I'm not sure of the real reason, if that's not.

[coreys]

Originally Posted by DustyPorViva

I think the rumor was he got tired of compiling the smaller updates. I'm not sure of the real reason, if that's not.

Large C/C++ projects can be notoriously long to compile...

[Jiroxys7]

Hopefully the new scripted playerlist wont be anywhere near as laggy as the ones that ive come across. i recall those sometimes seriously bogging down my graal client compared to the f7 playerlist.

[cbk1994]

Originally Posted by coreys

Large C/C++ projects can be notoriously long to compile...

I doubt that's the case, he makes new betas all the time and usually runs from his own latest "nightly" beta. The problem is that he's just not releasing these betas. I've had an Intel Mac client for probably two years now.

[FBI]

I heard the GUI player list does not have the option to sort by account name. Is this true?

[Draenin]

Eh, I would say not to rush it.

[Umat]

The scripted playerlist is really buggy, atleast for me. But then again, that might be fixed in a unreleased version.

[Hiro]

Originally Posted by Stefan

The new windows version has new rendering (DirectX9), input, particle engine, playerlist+options+profiles replaced by scripted windows, new Flash support. That means a lot of testing, and we are currently focusing on mobile platforms which is slowing down the development of the windows version right now. It's making good progress though. The old playerlist was actually not that powerful, but easy to use. The new scripted playerlist will definitely be better, and thanks to the scripting it is easier to modify and extend so you will not need to wait 2 years for an update again. The same can be said about the scripted RC, staff can expand the functionality.

|:

the dedicated get the worst treatment on this development platform

[taylor]

Personally, I'm excited for everything to be wrapped up and released.

The current beta that I'm using is pretty neat, although I freakin' hate the external windows for the playerlist...

Just my opinion though.

[Demisis_P2P]

Originally Posted by FBI

I heard the GUI player list does not have the option to sort by account name. Is this true?

That option has been ruined already.

Baszle
Crono
Demisis_P2P
DustyPorViva
Ferrow
Godzilla
Graal676402
Graal680107
Graal680215
Graal680681
Graal686060
Graal686517
Graal687607
Graal688001
Graal689249
Graal689271
Graal689330
Graal689771
Graal689841
Graal690039
Graal690276
Graal690730

[Fulg0reSama]

Originally Posted by Demisis_P2P

That option has been ruined already.

Baszle
Crono
Demisis_P2P
DustyPorViva
Ferrow
Godzilla
Graal676402
Graal680107
Graal680215
Graal680681
Graal686060
Graal686517
Graal687607
Graal688001
Graal689249
Graal689271
Graal689330
Graal689771
Graal689841
Graal690039
Graal690276
Graal690730

Shouldn't add so many graal people.

Should just remove the whole graal account labeling.

[James]

i mad

[TSAdmin]

Originally Posted by Demisis_P2P

That option has been ruined already.

Baszle
Crono
Demisis_P2P
DustyPorViva
Ferrow
Godzilla
Graal676402
Graal680107
Graal680215
Graal680681
Graal686060
Graal686517
Graal687607
Graal688001
Graal689249
Graal689271
Graal689330
Graal689771
Graal689841
Graal690039
Graal690276
Graal690730

It shows community name, not account, in the new version.