Playerworlds and Playerworlds.

[Skyld]

Right. I'd really like to know one thing.
Since you now all do like this Buy A Playerworld system, can playerworlds still be submitted the old way? If they can- how?

[ETD]

Originally posted by Skyld
Right. I'd really like to know one thing.
Since you now all do like this Buy A Playerworld system, can playerworlds still be submitted the old way? If they can- how?

all playerworlds will have to pay to stay up, even the ones online now...

as far as I know, the onyl way to get up is to pay $59 for 6 months, or $99 for a year, then pass a PWA inspection to go public

[Spark910]

No free servers .

[DustyPorViva]

Why was playerworld judging involved in the tryout if the PWA doesn't do that anymore?

[dorfindel]

Originally posted by DustyPorViva
Why was playerworld judging involved in the tryout if the PWA doesn't do that anymore?

Deciding which ones go public

[DustyPorViva]

You mean I have to pay for a server, then get it reviewed just to go public?

...

[ETD]

Originally posted by DustyPorViva
You mean I have to pay for a server, then get it reviewed just to go public?

...

yea...

[Lance]

Originally posted by DustyPorViva
You mean I have to pay for a server, then get it reviewed just to go public?

...

Yeah, that's the basic idea. What's wrong with the logic behind this? You pay for your own development server, and if it's good enough, you can have everyone play it. Otherwise, only gold/vip players will be able to play it, and it will remain in the third tab.

[Thallen]

Originally posted by Lance


Yeah, that's the basic idea. What's wrong with the logic behind this? You pay for your own development server, and if it's good enough, you can have everyone play it. Otherwise, only gold/vip players will be able to play it, and it will remain in the third tab.

I'm afraid that I don't see the login. People have to pay to make Graal money. I think playerworld managers should be paid, not have to pay...doesn't make much sense, in my little head.

[ETD]

Originally posted by Thallen
People have to pay to make Graal money.

How are private/UC/bad PW's making graal money? 0.o'

Remember, public worlds get a free month of hosting for every month they are public... meaning, if they are really good, and stay public, then they only have to pay the 1 time... but if the PW becomes bad, then they get moved to the third tab, and their months begin to tick away again.

Doesn;t it make sence that the PWs which do NOT make graal money have to pay, and the public ones do not have to?

[Spark910]

Originally posted by Lance


Yeah, that's the basic idea. What's wrong with the logic behind this? You pay for your own development server, and if it's good enough, you can have everyone play it. Otherwise, only gold/vip players will be able to play it, and it will remain in the third tab.

Well it wont be in a tab at all

[ETD]

Originally posted by Spark910

Well it wont be in a tab at all

technically
=X
but we all know what he ment

and I think it's become a common term to use now (third tab) since that's how it was talked about before....

though, with your idea Spark, there will actually be a third tab... but different than the one talked about before, which will make things a little confusing
:P
(is your idea ever going to happen?)

[Lance]

Originally posted by Thallen

I'm afraid that I don't see the login. People have to pay to make Graal money. I think playerworld managers should be paid, not have to pay...doesn't make much sense, in my little head.

Um, if you think those dev servers are making much money other than from the people paying for them, you are sorely mistaken.

[Scott]

Originally posted by Lance


Um, if you think those dev servers are making much money other than from the people paying for them, you are sorely mistaken.

I think he ment, people have to pay for servers, which will bring GO profit instead of themselves. Basically, owners pay money so GO can make money.

[Nitkizi]

Erm, Stefan told me there will be four tabs altogether :|