Graal 'Classic' 3D (picture heavy) - Page 11

Fulg0reSama · #**151** 04-26-2010, 02:47 AM

I was being sarcastic about that comment trifle lol. Now we need some of the baddies. Like the octo rock shooting creature (forget the name entirely) and such. Would be leet.

Dnegel · #**152** 04-26-2010, 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fulg0reSama

Like the octo rock shooting creature

This?

alarid0 · #**153** 04-28-2010, 01:21 AM

You think the character is too tall? Make him shorter if you really feel like it but I think it would look pretty bizarre if the characters were as short as that little table.

Fulg0reSama · #**154** 04-28-2010, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dnegel

This?

Yes the octorok as it says in the link.

trifle · #**155** 04-28-2010, 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alarid0

You think the character is too tall? Make him shorter if you really feel like it but I think it would look pretty bizarre if the characters were as short as that little table.

No, I don't think he is too tall, I agree, it would look bizarre if he was smaller then he already is.
I just meant that I have made him too tall if you compare him to the 2d version.
Since I was trying to be 100% true to Graal, I'm off.
I figured that it wasn't the best way of doing it when it comes to the character since the perspective on graal is way off.

jacob_bald6225 · #**156** 04-29-2010, 06:37 AM

Can't wait to see how you do the tree.

RegretZ · #**157** 01-06-2011, 05:13 PM

Bump.

Whatever happened to Graal 3D? The project actually MIGHT have had some potential.

fowlplay4 · #**158** 01-06-2011, 06:01 PM

Graal 3D failed and was deemed an exploration for the company/Cyberjourers. Hell they built it off one of the cheapest 3D engines ever.

Many would agree that they should of spent the time developing/improving a quality 2D server instead.

Elk · #**159** 01-06-2011, 07:55 PM

they should work with the UDK

Soala · #**160** 01-06-2011, 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elk

they should work with the UDK

I absolutely agree.

Galdor · #**161** 01-06-2011, 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elk

they should work with the UDK

Yea would be nice

fowlplay4 · #**162** 01-06-2011, 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soala

I absolutely agree.

I really doubt they would want to give up 25% and other chunks of their revenue to Unreal for licensing.

RegretZ · #**163** 01-06-2011, 09:54 PM

Well, I noticed earlier in this thread someone mentioned the more recent pokemon games, and how they are 3D in a 2D environment. Personally I think that maybe that would be worth a try with Graal, since the perspective works out great, and it's easy to tile for compared to a 3D world.

xXziroXx · #**164** 01-06-2011, 10:00 PM

Stop trying to make Graal into something it isn't and go play another game if you want to play something with 3D.

DustyPorViva · #**165** 01-06-2011, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xXziroXx

Stop trying to make Graal into something it isn't and go play another game if you want to play something with 3D.

This is kind of close-minded I think. I'm no fan of Graal's past endeavors in 3D AT ALL, but to say "graal isn't 3D" isn't really true. Mario, Zelda and so were not 3D before either, but then the N64 changed that.