setting up UDP again.

EclipsedAngel · #1 02-09-2010, 11:11 PM

Ok so I set my modem to bridge mode, and I made my router open to port 14922
but it's still not working.

I forgot how I set this up.

The IP that's given to my computer for my router is 192.168.2.2 so I set the IP to that.

Inbound port and private port are both 14922. Type set to UDP.

I saw a page on graalonline.com that shows all the ports used on graal, but I forgot it. It was like 14xxx-15xxx or something.

When I get my UDP to work. If I open up 2 clients, my 2 character's x and y positions should be the same, and the characters will appear to overlap eachother, sharing the same X Y position, but instead the characters are frozen.

Hiro · #2 02-10-2010, 01:58 AM

the correct port is 14899

EclipsedAngel · #3 02-10-2010, 02:35 AM

I put it on that and it works thanks

Hiro · #4 02-10-2010, 06:36 AM

i'm glad that was the problem and not something more complex (:

EclipsedAngel · #5 02-17-2010, 05:04 AM

It still messes up a lot and I get errors. There really needs to be a more efficient UDP system on graal.

Hiro · #6 02-17-2010, 06:42 AM

i also get frequent UDP errors regardless of how correct my settings appear to be

EclipsedAngel · #7 02-22-2010, 07:53 AM

hopefully it will be updated but I doubt it.

EclipsedAngel · #8 04-11-2010, 01:14 AM

I've done everything to try to unblock the port but it's not working anymore.

When I enable UDP, all the other people using UDP can't see me anymore but I can see them. Why is this happening?

This is what I got on my router

http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/5650/ports.png

DustyPorViva · #9 04-11-2010, 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EclipsedAngel

I've done everything to try to unblock the port but it's not working anymore.

When I enable UDP, all the other people using UDP can't see me anymore but I can see them. Why is this happening?

This is what I got on my router

http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/5650/ports.png

Change the port in Graal to something else and try that?

EclipsedAngel · #10 04-11-2010, 01:34 AM

What's the range of ports that graal uses?

EclipsedAngel · #11 04-11-2010, 01:39 AM

Graal is being real stubborn and I tried everything. I tried unblocking my firewalls and it still doesn't work so I guess I give up.

I'm really annoyed by this though. Like I said 100 times before, you guys need to rescript the UDP connection system.

cbk1994 · #12 04-11-2010, 01:41 AM

What's the advantage to UDP anyway?

EclipsedAngel · #13 04-11-2010, 01:43 AM

Faster connection because UDP doesn't have to check info to make sure the packets aren't malformed. I think it's direct connection too basically.

I like using microphone sometimes too.
A few weeks back I heard some people on microphone so it works to some extent sometimes.
It seems to really give me trouble when I'm on a DSL connection.

DustyPorViva · #14 04-11-2010, 01:59 AM

Sadly either my modem or my Apartment complex(who I 'rent' internet from) block ports for me -_- Pretty much ALL ports are blocked, and forwarding ports with my router accomplishes nothing.

cbk1994 · #15 04-11-2010, 02:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DustyPorViva

Sadly either my modem or my Apartment complex(who I 'rent' internet from) block ports for me -_- Pretty much ALL ports are blocked, and forwarding ports with my router accomplishes nothing.

Sounds more like a double NAT issue.

EclipsedAngel · #16 04-11-2010, 10:13 PM

When I had cable it seemed to work just fine. I always have problems with it when I'm on DSL.

fowlplay4 · #17 04-11-2010, 10:18 PM

UDP may be removed in the next client, js.

Crono · #18 04-12-2010, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fowlplay4

UDP may be removed in the next client, js.

that's pretty stupid

fowlplay4 · #19 04-12-2010, 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crono

that's pretty stupid

Why? Only a minuscule percentage of the playercount actually use it or know it's actually there.

As for a vent-similar chat, as long as you can mute it'll be fine.

Crono · #20 04-12-2010, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fowlplay4

Why? Only a minuscule percentage of the playercount actually use it or know it's actually there.

Try sparring.

Rufus · #21 04-13-2010, 05:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fowlplay4

Why? Only a minuscule percentage of the playercount actually use it or know it's actually there.

UN's Current Playercount: 69
Has UDP option checked: 39 (57%)
Has UDP option unchecked: 30 (43%)

fowlplay4 · #22 04-13-2010, 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rufus

UN's Current Playercount: 69
Has UDP option checked: 39
Has UDP option unchecked: 30

Zodiac's Current: 48 - RCs (6) = 42
No UDP: 39
Using UDP: 3

Seems pretty minuscule to me, I guess UN has just used the mic feature more than others.

SKJF91 · #23 04-12-2010, 01:07 AM

Upnp?!

EclipsedAngel · #24 04-12-2010, 02:44 AM

As well as microphone use?

fowlplay4 · #25 04-12-2010, 03:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EclipsedAngel

As well as microphone use?

I guess so.

cbk1994 · #26 04-12-2010, 04:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fowlplay4

I guess so.

Would be awesome if Graal had built-in Ventrilo-like voice communication. Each server can create channels under their set, otherwise there would be global ones. Only problem is that it would be virtually impossible to have someone there all the time moderating it.

Seeya · #27 04-12-2010, 05:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbk1994

Would be awesome if Graal had built-in Ventrilo-like voice communication. Each server can create channels under their set, otherwise there would be global ones. Only problem is that it would be virtually impossible to have someone there all the time moderating it.

omfg this

Demisis_P2P · #28 04-12-2010, 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbk1994

Would be awesome if Graal had built-in Ventrilo-like voice communication. Each server can create channels under their set, otherwise there would be global ones. Only problem is that it would be virtually impossible to have someone there all the time moderating it.

Nobody moderates the current voice chat so why would they need to moderate a more useful version of voice chat?
If people don't like what they're hearing they can vote to kick somebody from the channel, or leave themselves.

cbk1994 · #29 04-12-2010, 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Demisis_P2P

Nobody moderates the current voice chat so why would they need to moderate a more useful version of voice chat?
If people don't like what they're hearing they can vote to kick somebody from the channel, or leave themselves.

are you serious?

Old_Days · #30 04-12-2010, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbk1994

Would be awesome if Graal had built-in Ventrilo-like voice communication. Each server can create channels under their set, otherwise there would be global ones. Only problem is that it would be virtually impossible to have someone there all the time moderating it.

Wonder if my vent crashing programs I found would work on it

fowlplay4 · #31 04-13-2010, 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old_Days

Wonder if my vent crashing programs I found would work on it

It wouldn't because it wouldn't be a ventrilo server.

SKJF91 · #32 04-12-2010, 08:04 AM

Graal provides the ability to mute people

EclipsedAngel · #33 04-12-2010, 10:37 AM

So I exclude my router and UDP works. I've done everything with that piece of crap and it still doesn't work.

Last thing I can think of is calling customer service on my router.

EclipsedAngel · #34 04-12-2010, 09:59 PM

Does anybody here have a belkin router?

Trak · #35 04-13-2010, 03:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EclipsedAngel

Does anybody here have a belkin router?

Me.