Who thinks their UC playerworld will become successful and reach the Classic tab?

[DarkCloud_PK]

c'mon, really?

[MysticX2X]

Not with the current rate they charge for accounts.

[coreys]

Psst.
There should be a "maybe" option.

[maximus_asinus]

should combine first and second option, because really, none of you are going anywhere.

[Clockwork]

Once I get a few more developers addicted to testbed...I shall enslave them and force them to develop an amazing server! >:3

[xXziroXx]

I do.

[Vima]

At the end of the day, there is actually just one UC server who have been able to survive this long.
I believe the chances are very good for AEON.

[MysticX2X]

Originally Posted by Vima

At the end of the day, there is actually just one UC server who have been able to survive this long.
I believe the chances are very good for AEON.

Yeah, after how many years?

[Door]

Sodom and Gumdrops will never be put on the tab. After 46 rebuilds (and all 46 times ending up with a consistent playerbase of over 300 players every night, averaging 600 on Sunday nights), it wasn't put on the tab once. ...And after being destroyed by Stefan and Unixmad 46 times out of pure jealousy, I'm not sure I have the strength to bring it to the people again.

[Vima]

Originally Posted by MysticX2X

Yeah, after how many years?

Exactly! Mainly because of lack of developers.

Everyone starts their own projects, some with potential.
Then they die out.

I don't know how many servers in my years I've seen die. I just sigh everytime that happen...

Like it or not.

[DustyPorViva]

Originally Posted by Vima

At the end of the day, there is actually just one UC server who have been able to survive this long.
I believe the chances are very good for AEON.

Only thing it takes an UC server to survive is a little money. Has nothing to do with effort or quality.

[Vima]

Originally Posted by DustyPorViva

Only thing it takes an UC server to survive is a little money. Has nothing to do with effort or quality.

Money is usually not the issue with servers.
Everyone can find one way or another to repay their server or to repay their gold.

AEON have been on the edges to die aswell. There have been, gosh I don't know how many downfalls.
But the problem for us have never really been repaying for the server, it have been "solving" the downfalls.
For other servers that die out, it's just the lack of commitment I think. Mainly from the Managers/Owners

[DustyPorViva]

Originally Posted by Vima

Money is usually not the issue with servers.
Everyone can find one way or another to repay their server or to repay their gold.
It's just the lack of commitment I think.

Doesn't really matter for an UC server. Any single one of them can pull the, "we've got years of being around!" when it doesn't really matter when all you have to do is pay for year after year. Doesn't prove a damn thing towards the quality or success of the server. It's not like you have to maintain some sort of standards to stay UC.

[Vima]

Originally Posted by DustyPorViva

Doesn't really matter for an UC server. Any single one of them can pull the, "we've got years of being around!" when it doesn't really matter when all you have to do is pay for year after year. Doesn't prove a damn thing towards the quality or success of the server. It's not like you have to maintain some sort of standards to stay UC.

Exactly!
I'm talking about my experience. I'm talking about AEON, not any other servers.

About the quality work ; AEON, mainly the modern world, has one of the most "quality work" I have ever seen on Graal.

[DustyPorViva]

Originally Posted by Vima

Exactly!
I'm talking about my experience. I'm talking about AEON, not any other servers.

About the quality work ; AEON, mainly the modern world, has one of the most "quality work" I have ever seen on Graal.

My point is your original post boasts how long Aeon has been 'surviving' as an UC server when it's an effortless achievement.

Then again I'm sure you've done enough boasting about all of Aeon's other 'qualities' to cover up this minor slip-up.