View Single Post
  #10  
Old 08-15-2011, 10:50 PM
cbk1994 cbk1994 is offline
the fake one
cbk1994's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 10,718
cbk1994 has a reputation beyond reputecbk1994 has a reputation beyond reputecbk1994 has a reputation beyond reputecbk1994 has a reputation beyond reputecbk1994 has a reputation beyond reputecbk1994 has a reputation beyond reputecbk1994 has a reputation beyond reputecbk1994 has a reputation beyond reputecbk1994 has a reputation beyond reputecbk1994 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to cbk1994
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chompy View Post
"Changes should only be made because those changes will be useful." That's really productive, right...
Yes, it is productive. If you add changes that aren't useful then by definition they'll seldom be used, and the time used to add them is wasted.

I'm guessing we agree and I just wasn't very clear in making my point. You wouldn't advocate adding feature X to GScript just because language Y has it, right?

The post I was replying to said exactly that:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubble13 View Post
There don't have to be any situations. It can be said that a scripting language really isn't complete without regular expressions.
In other words, "even if nobody would ever use them, they should still be added because lots of other languages support them."
__________________
Reply With Quote