Quote:
Originally Posted by WanDaMan
Yeah it is going to boost sales
|
At the cost of quality content. The people willing to pay for servers aren't always the most capable of managers, and the more capable ones will likely want to keep the private UC phase until they have a polished server - in which case, it would probably make it to the list regardless
Quote:
|
introduce players to developing
|
This isn't necessarily a good thing. Graal depending purely on playermade content is part of the reason why it's slipping. Couple that with your suggestion: making people pay to give players more reason to pay for Graal, and that's going to deter some developers more than Graal already does.
In fact, I contend that Graal has
too many playerworlds as it is. With so many servers spreading out the already small talent pool, none of them really see any progress in improving.
Quote:
|
get PWA involved more within the community to name a few.
|
PWA obviously don't care about quality control (or else can't handle it), and the few times they step in currently have usually been rushed and considered bad decisions by all involved. They either need more stricter rules for themselves or to get more hands on with the current servers.