View Single Post
  #77  
Old 10-28-2008, 01:29 AM
xXziroXx xXziroXx is offline
Malorian
xXziroXx's Avatar
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,289
xXziroXx has a brilliant futurexXziroXx has a brilliant futurexXziroXx has a brilliant futurexXziroXx has a brilliant futurexXziroXx has a brilliant futurexXziroXx has a brilliant futurexXziroXx has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yocas View Post
Ok but why the hell would anyone want to have to pay ANYTHING for a dead 2D game when you could easily play for a free MMO that has 100x more players than Graal? That's the point I'm trying to bring.
Far from everyone feels this way, obviously, since Graal is still making money. And yes, it is somewhat dead to what it used to be, but it goes up and down like it always have. Just since they changed the whole account system, there's been a **** load of Graal#### registered, meaning there's definitely new players coming.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Yocas View Post
On top of that, why are we paying to make servers on a game that's keeping it alive entirely?
You're looking at it from the wrong perspective. No one is forcing you to develop your own server, if you want to make your own playerworld you have to rent space for a server - exactly like webhosts etc.

And don't bring up the "but I need gold to work on UC servers!!" bullcrap, because CJ changed that a while back. If you pay for Graal, you get access to everything, whether you want it or not. That alone is an awesome change, sure it makes the game a little bit more expensive, but it unites the subscriptions into a single one which makes it more efficient in the long run.

If you were to combine the prices of the previous P2P, Zone Gold, Kingdoms Gold, and Playerworlds Gold - it'd be a lot more expensive then the current subscription.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yocas View Post
If you're satisfied with anything about how the payment system of Graal then you sir are retarded.
Whatever you say.
__________________
Follow my work on social media post-Graal:Updated august 2025.
Reply With Quote