Quote:
Originally Posted by DustyPorViva
I have never seen a thread closed because it was answered. Please, show me the rule that states that. Should I start reporting every single thread that has been answered? If it's in the wrong section then move it... I know you mods can do that.
Like I posted before, I don't understand why you're so hostile towards this thread. Are you scared you're gonna lose your moderation from a sudden realization of the higher-ups?
Anyways, back on the topic I agree with Rufus and co. I don't think there's a need for that many moderators. Hell, I doubt you need 5 moderators to moderate the whole Graal forums. It's just not that active. It's already stated that Vulcan is inactive, so why is he still a mod? I guess there is no harm in having that many moderators, but it seems like way more than is needed. Look at PW's. I'm sure if they had 15 GPs, or 15 ET's, or 15 FAQs everyone would be screaming as to why there are so many... I can't see the harm in it, can you? Nah... but it still sounds like a lot, right? Is there really a need for that many when 1/3 of that amount could cover the job?
|
I've seen threads closed when they were answered. I also don't think it's needed, except we decide the topic should not discussed or spammed anymore. In this case (thread) I wanted to post my opinion (which I also can when it is closed, I know) and give other users also a chance to discuss it.
My experience is, not every staff/mod is online around the clock but users/posters are able to post all the time. Having more mods makes sure that threads can be better controlled. Zone is not over moderated in relation to the rest.