With some of them, it's obvious. But, which rules hold more weight than others? For instance, I really doubt that staff are going to stop massing through RC on Valikorlia (many high admins, and even co-managers, have tried and failed
)... so, I would hope that the massing rule holds little weight in the event that a PWA actually comes on Valikorlia to check on how well rules are followed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyld
Well, the reason I use the word "reinvent" is because things like scripted "warpto" or "warpother" are reinventing what's already there. In which case, it would be better from not only a security aspect, but also an organisational aspect, to just use the RC rights. I don't have a problem with things like "summon" because they aren't really needlessly reinventing; they are not strictly already existing functionality.
|
From my experience, a scripted warpto usually doesn't work; for instance, I have to log on RC to use warpto, even though it's scripted in to the staff NPC. I guess I can understand the point (even though it's not hard to "reinvent" the commands
). I just wanted to make sure that staff NPCs weren't out-right banned. Which, as I can see, they aren't.