![]() |
Doesn't anyone want to pool together to make something?
I bet if all the development staff working on current servers made a new one it might actually get done.
Not that that'd ever happen realistically but, something new needs to happen. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Developing an entirely new server isn't going to solve any of the current problems.
Solving the current problems however could make it more feasible for new servers to be developed. |
Quote:
|
If people can't cooperate together on their own private projects, what makes you think they will come together to create something? Put three NATs together and you've already got one trying to cut down the other; the third never logs in.
Quote:
|
Quote:
You're also saying that a Graal Administrator, who isn't known for being astute with server design, should push aside the massive to-do list of things that are arguably overdue, in order to attempt a mountainous task that so many teams of developers have failed to accomplish in over half a dozen years? |
Quote:
And something needs to happen because PC Graal is boring and not worth paying for, sad to say. At least for what they're asking, and especially given how successful iGraal is. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But why is it up the community to make it worth money, and not say... the people taking in all of the profit? I'll cut to the chase: it isn't worth it for any player to clean this mess up, not until we've been given better tools, clearer communication, or just a slice of the pie we're selling. |
Quote:
Quote:
Maybe he would get interested in a big project and provide some support for it. Farfetched but, still maybe. |
hell yea bro im up for it lets pool our **** together
|
Quote:
I have no clue why people are accepting this, it's a reversed world. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I feel like anything beyond that reasoning right there is just ignorance waiting for exploit, Which Stefan feeds off of. |
Quote:
|
Given this is a volunteer-ran game and I don't really make any money doing it, I'm completely over intentional stressing myself with development, and prefer to work on what I want and with people I like.
|
Hiro I've seen you post some cool ideas occasionally. You should make your own playerworld, get some of the basics finished, and then ask if anyone wants to help out.
|
Why not contribute to an existent server that's going downhill. As opposed to making something new that will go downhill.
In case you haven't noticed, PC Graal is stretched thin. None of the servers look like appealing, playable games, and they're all too different to see a large shared playerbase. You're not going to "save" the game with a new server, no matter how quality it is. What you can do is address present faults. Giving people a reason to stick around is far more feasible than creating something to bring people in (the latter isn't the Graal developer's job anyway). |
Not to mention you'd be fighting the games owners every step of the way until they just ban you.
|
Quote:
Quote:
You know as well as I do that the only people sticking around are those who have been playing a long time with the random iPhone kid who shows up every once in awhile. And you know that whenever a new server is released, even if it's old and busted, the player-count goes up and people get together. Now if there's an actual reason to stay on the server after the release population swell, then we'll have something worth playing. It could even be complete **** bare bones and it would be more worthwhile than say, UN or Classic. |
Quote:
What you're doing is presenting a short-sighted idea, an ill thought out pipedream, and then talking out of your ass to defend it. You're not speaking up with some brilliant insight that's going to revitalize the game and usher in a new era, you're repeating the same blissful thread that has happened every few months for the past few years. Another server won't fix anything. Everyone's had the same silly high spirits as you at one point, but it's quite blatant as to what the problem is: Graal isn't good. More servers - even a single, fantastic one - will just be the equivalent of sweeping the dust under the rug. It's not going to fix anything, just very briefly make it look less obvious. This has happened so many times before, and done nothing to improve Graal as a whole - because it's beyond improving. And why should it even be improved? Where is the motivation to create a wonderful server? Then what? You manage it, you update it. All for nothing. Until a few staff members drop out, get replaced with less enthusiastic and talented ones, oblivious to the original sight. And then the server becomes Endora. It becomes Delteria. It becomes N-Pulse or Shaded Legend. It becomes any one of the countless servers who owe their unexistence to your very line of thinking. Look at the iPhone servers. Look at their popularity. It's not a matter of a good server. They excel because of their accessibility. PC Graal being successful and polished and playable is water from a stone by this point. iGraal has found a way to just sell the stones. PC Graal's problem is nothing related to the content. The content is what you'd expect from diligent (yet unpaid) developers. PC Graal's problem is the nonchalant administration who don't give a **** about working with the people actually responsible for their paying customers. So instead of wasting your time and everyone's effort on a new server doomed to fail, why don't you contribute to what already exists and is known to keep players around? A fascinating new server isn't what dragged me back, with high hopes and determination for a fun game. The prospect of sitting in some level slightly younger than I am and chatting with a few friends did. |
I don't think anymore could be said, in any better fashion, than what was just said above.
Change must come from without, not within. We are still waiting. |
Quote:
Quote:
We won't solve the larger problems at hand. That's entirely up to the administration at this point. We've asked them for years for support and they don't give it, so what can developers do? At least a new server would be SOMETHING to do. Quote:
Quote:
|
Since your plan here is to ignore everything that addresses why you're wrong, I'll just do the opposite and respond to you piece-by-piece.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You thinking that Unholy Nation or Zodiac or whatever isn't up to par is an extreme example of setting the bar far too high. This medium is lower than many F2P MMOs and low-key indie games. You cannot seriously expect anything great from it. Every server is top notch for what they are. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It's actually developing for the existent and somewhat lacking servers. That's a cause that will actually have a positive effect. Quote:
Quote:
Like, I want to delve into this point deeper, but your train of thought is literally so shallow and... almost in reverse, that I don't think it's actually possible to reason with you any more complexly than just with a blunt, "no, you're wrong, this is why". But it's clear that you can't even comprehend that point, so I'll just let you continue on your merry way. Your ideal for "fixing" Graal is bad. It's baseless, it's shallow, it's happened a million times to no avail. I've cited multiple servers that were your exact plan, these "dream team" run servers that were meant to pump life into Graal, and they've only fallen into obscurity. You yourself have referenced servers that were meant to be the "next big things", only to fail. |
Quote:
I 10000% agree with this. |
If you agree with it so much, you should've fixed my typo so I wouldn't look bad!
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
As for what I want, it's clear you don't understand it because you're a scrub who was never up to the challenge. As someone who wants Graal to be a chatroom, you have different priorities. If all you want is to chat, I'm sure the current servers seem just fine to you. Quote:
Quote:
As an extremely stupid suggestion, just for you, if the existing servers are such a priority, then why not have more cross-server staff? Pool those brilliant people together and have the improve together. Oh but they won't work together right? Time to just let them work alone and wait on the administration to help them instead. That'll totally work, we've seen it work before. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
How about you stop focusing on your bias towards me and genuinely answer? :cool: |
Quote:
|
I'm still willing to bet Valikorlia would take any of you starry-eyed developers.
|
Quote:
You make such good posts I can see why your rep is so high. :D |
lol no kia345 u r
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hiro your not wrong for wanting more people to enjoy graal. The thing is to make something new will require time, effort and money which you are fully aware of. This has been tried a lot in the past only to end up failing because of the three points that I mentioned. Even if the server did make it into the classic tab the dedication to hold the server up and running wouldn't be there anymore because of the huge amount of work to just get it into classic was already to much. The thing that I want to say is that the higher management should remove these barriers for the dev's, by as said before adding new dev tools or lowering the price of the subs to make a server. The higher management would most likely also benefit from this, but they are incompetent. I am a player not a dev or whatever, I just want to play and enjoy the game (even though I rarely log in). I think that instead of focusing on creating something new it would be better to update the servers we have atm until the higher management actually do things for the devs to make it easier for them. Instead of making efforts for a new server it would be better to make effort for the consisting servers, as a player I would enjoy that more rather than waiting 1 or 2 years for a new server. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Perhaps it's someone starting work on a server, and suddenly wanting to remake all of the original work that may have been done up to a point when a new tool becomes available because it has the potential to be much better than continuing with the older tools and content that has already been developed. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
How about a level maker that works offline with .png tilesets? Or just a level maker that was made in this century? It's bones-old and horrible. There are work-arounds for this, but it introduces a barrier of entry for new developers. Explaining how to LAT at the last Val Con was kind of a joke in that regard. "Take your nice .PNG and save it as a .GIF so that the level maker can be previewed offline." As for those of you who'd rather not work on Valikorlia, I think it's a pretty good indication of why I don't think this thread's point is very feasible. People don't like working together, and that statement itself is quickly denied by most; yet when you dig into what "working together" means (the sacrifices, the hard work, the mere socializing), developers have limited patience. |
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 03:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.