Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   Feature request (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=194)
-   -   Graal v5 for Nintendo DS. (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=75684)

D4rKv310c1ty 07-27-2007 04:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by haunter (Post 1334656)
I was just reading a wiki article about MapleStory DS which is due out in Korea in September. It will mark the first MMO on the DS (or a handheld for that matter?) I wonder what the systems reqs for MapleStory's PC version are compared to Graal's...

Hmm. But according to the info on Wikipedia MapleStory DS will only support up to "2-4 player party mode" which isn't very "MMO"

It's not always about reqs. Alot of it is coding too, even so in some levels and areas Graal could easily crash a system DS because it would overflow it's memory too much.

OMGosh 07-27-2007 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D4rKv310c1ty (Post 1334646)
Dev kit, Schmev kit. You can make an offline version but (this has been said already) it defies the point of Graal online and most probably will be a cheap rip of Zelda.

Stefans already said, the DS just simply can't handle the page memory overflow.
NO.

If you've got nothing to contribute about Graal being put out on a system as an offline adventure game, don't say anything at all. You're going WAY off topic. It would be used as a promotion/marketting strategy for the REAL Graal. Also, how could it NOT be a knock-off of Zelda, it used to be called "Zelda Online Adventures," Graal wouldn't exist if it didn't look so Zelda-like.


Stop going off topic, you're all bothering me. More for Stefan to read means less to be done.

(If you disagree, and think nothing will happen, SHUT UP because nobody here gives a crap about your opinion.)

Good Day/Night.

MysticX2X 07-27-2007 07:52 AM

Well i been lookin at this ds web browser that was just recently released. It includes a ram expansion of 8mb that will connect in the gba slot. Search "Nintendo_DS_Memory_Expansion_Pak" in wikipedia for more information. The new Ds web browser supports java but not flash :(

Whoopsie, haunter mentioned the memory extension. But he didnt mention the browsers capability!

It wouldve been cool if the ds browser could take some media but it says it cant support videos so thats a bummer.

Crono 07-27-2007 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OMGosh (Post 1334692)
(If you disagree, and think nothing will happen, SHUT UP because nobody here gives a crap about your opinion.)

Like anyone cares about your opinion even if you agree?

D4rKv310c1ty 07-27-2007 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OMGosh (Post 1334692)
If you've got nothing to contribute about Graal being put out on a system as an offline adventure game, don't say anything at all. You're going WAY off topic. It would be used as a promotion/marketting strategy for the REAL Graal. Also, how could it NOT be a knock-off of Zelda, it used to be called "Zelda Online Adventures," Graal wouldn't exist if it didn't look so Zelda-like.


Stop going off topic, you're all bothering me. More for Stefan to read means less to be done.

(If you disagree, and think nothing will happen, SHUT UP because nobody here gives a crap about your opinion.)

Good Day/Night.

Like Gerami said, who cares about your oppinion if "no one" cares about ours.

It doesn't matter how much Stefan reads, it's still
Not-Going-To-Be-Done.

Exactly, so if there's already a real Zelda out and Graal obviously being majorly influenced by Zelda it wouldn't do Graal any good in the first place. Players will notice that it is a cheap rip of Zelda and the offline version wouldn't proceed at all in the first place in the retail market.

Go ahead, make cheap offline versions with all your fancy so-called Dev kits, and then eventually distribute it as a free ROM, because at the end of the day it's going to stay as a free ROM and it'd infringe copyright laws if anyone else other than Linux Cyberjouers sold it as a properly packaged retail version.

OK, talking about Mystic. 4MB of Memory added onto the expansion 8MB is still 12MB. That is far from enough for an online version of Graal online to be ported to a DS. Although this inspires hope in that someone could create a device which holds a large amount of memory at this moment of time, there is none.

Get it into your head OMGosh, it's NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.

Atleast not for a system like DS. I'm not saying I personally dislike the DS, I love it. I have one myself and even an emulator card to play rips and etc, but it's system is too weak for the Graal client and could easily crash at any point.

Maybe, just maybe it'll be easier to port to Xbox as there is a keyboard peripheral that you can buy for it, but what with the Xbox slowly morphing into a computer system you may iswell just sit at your desk and thrash the S button whilst posting rant threads about GK on the forums (which is what Graal mostly consists of).

Even if it was ported, the game pad controller would still prove inconvenience. It'd simply be too hard to play with, I once used a PS2 similar looking controller (USB) on the PC and tried to play to Graal, result? Too hard.

Just no..
NO.

zim5354 07-27-2007 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D4rKv310c1ty (Post 1334766)

Even if it was ported, the game pad controller would still prove inconvenience. It'd simply be too hard to play with, I once used a PS2 similar looking controller (USB) on the PC and tried to play to Graal, result? Too hard.

Just no..
NO.

You could always play with the D pad, I doubt this will happen though.

cbk1994 07-27-2007 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D4rKv310c1ty (Post 1334766)
Not-Going-To-Be-Done.
free
NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.
NO.

Nice use of bold, capitals, and large letters ^^

D4rKv310c1ty 07-27-2007 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbkbud (Post 1334769)
Nice use of bold, capitals, and large letters ^^

Thank you.

CABAL49 07-27-2007 08:05 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I have a solution.Attachment 42198

Twinny 07-27-2007 08:06 PM

Technically I think Nintendo's only qualm with 'Zelda Online' was the fact that it was called 'Zelda Online'. Now there isn't that many similarities. Unless Nintendo hold a grudge, I don't think this will stop it.

I think time, finances and hardware will prevent this project.

OMGosh 07-27-2007 09:24 PM

Can that 'Darkvelocity' person be banned from this thread? He's not contributing at all. Who the hell would go and play a 2d-ish game on an xbox?

That's like releasing Pong for the PS3. Wtf?

MysticX2X 07-27-2007 09:47 PM

Why would they need to waste their time porting it to DS? If they could be using that time fixing v5, finishing graal 3d, etc.

If i was in any wireless zone, itd be my house and i could just play graal on my laptop.

OMGosh 07-27-2007 09:55 PM

Graal 3D was a failure. As I told you, and everyone else before, this is not to target already-playing players, it's to target non-players and get them to play.

Twinny 07-27-2007 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OMGosh (Post 1334870)
Graal 3D was a failure. As I told you, and everyone else before, this is not to target already-playing players, it's to target non-players and get them to play.

Finishing the current projects and looking into advertising would also target non-players...probably alot more effectively.

UberModeKappa 07-28-2007 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OMGosh (Post 1334870)
Graal 3D was a failure. As I told you, and everyone else before, this is not to target already-playing players, it's to target non-players and get them to play.

You're coming off as a know-it-all (douche bag).


Check yourself before you wreck yourself.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.