| LoneAngelIbesu |
04-11-2010 09:49 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crono
(Post 1568523)
I'm pretty sure Val had a pop of ~40 then. And even during this time it was a very close playerbase.
|
Yes. The playercount was anywhere from 40-60 (about the same as UN and Era today -- not Zodiac, that was a mistake), as compared its pitiful 20-30 now (on its best days). That would make Valikorlia, at the time of elections, a 'medium'-sized server.
I don't know what you mean by 'close', though. If by close you mean we argued over masses, then yeah, we were all 'close'.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crono
(Post 1568523)
For some reason I doubt this, because I do not remember Val holding such a high playercount during this time period.
|
I do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crono
(Post 1568523)
Anyways, Valikorlia's playerbase was always very closed and I'm 100% sure the vast majority of those who took part in the election weren't clueless dolts. I'm quite confident a pretty big number of them have had staff experience and played the server for a while. Compare this to UN/Era/Zodiac's players and you'll see why an election system just wont work.
|
It doesn't matter how close or how smart the players are. What matters is if the people running for manager are capable, reliable, responsible, etc. You should have a situation where the server would be just fine no matter who would be elected, where the election is just a matter of what direction the players want the server to go. |
