![]() |
Quote:
Like bread |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think good developers either are doing their own playerworlds, or work on good projects. I dont see a reason for applications for playerworlds. If an idea is good, then it might peek the interest of good developers. That's how I see it, anyway... |
The real pro to applications is that less servers = devs gathered.
There are plently of competent devs on Classic servers that appear to work together fine enough to keep the sever running, so I don't quite see it written on the walls that it will result in destructive (to the staff roster and the server) drama frequently. You're going to have mature and immature staff wherever you go ;p Anyways, Dusty pretty much hit the nail on the head, but it seems as though many believe Graal isn't worth it's current prices anymore, and when you inflate the prices, you should inflate the quality of the game to make people WANT to pay for it, which is why controlling the quality of the servers could be worth a shot. I'm not necesscarily saying yes or no to it, myself, but sometimes a business may need to take risks to survive ;o |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Yeah, it's ridiculous.
Players develop his game, he should at least develop/update our tools z.z |
I don't think it's a good idea just because it would take away too much money from the game. Stefan makes the majority of his income from playerworlds, not player accounts. Or atleast half.. ;x
The reason most people like graal is because it's developed and run by the players, for the most part it is anyway. Taking the ability to make your own playerworld away, no matter how crappy, would take away from it's spark imo. :mad: Some players might not be as talented or creative, but it takes time to learn. There really is no other way to learn to script other than buying a server so unless Stefan plans on making a gs2 editor, that would actually slim down the number of new developers aswell. Maybe the PWAs could give server stars to rate how good they are based on content already developed and the future plans that they have for the server. Aswell as maybe telling what they already have done. Obviously, there are way too many playerworlds to get to them all, and some (the bad) servers might not agree to it. But at the owner's request they could inspect the server every, say 6 months. ^^ It would help developers choose which servers to work for so they aren't just wasting their time with some dead end project and could instead work on a well thought out one with other good developers. Though I guess it shouldn't be that hard for you to figure out if it's going to be a waste of time or not for yourself. :p |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
I believe I've seen this discussion before, I just can't remember the thread.
Anyway, I think if they're willing to pay for it, they should be allowed to have one. People could want it for practice, fun, or just to have a place to call their own. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Yeah, but it would be nice to be able to see them all instead of waiting for a new update. There are other servers worth working on other than just those. Quote:
|
GS2 is more similar to C#, C++, or Java than GS1.
|
Quote:
|
Wow, this must have been planned out by Stefan and Unix!
"Let's create a crappy GS1 scripting language and let it become the primary scripting language for awhile.. then we'll unleash GS2 and watch the insanity begin.." |
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.