Thats when you put them on ignore o.O?

I agree with the above agreements.

Meh...I think cutting it down in size would be fine...like 30 seconds between...I can see new trials becoming rebellious w/ spam as previously said.

bump, this would be really helpful.

Agreed, when I was a trial this was very annoying when I was talking to FAQs.

*steals stamps* HAHA! Now you gotta approve all of ya' stuff by hand!

*uses one of the stamps to stamp approval on the thread*

I thought this was already possible through the wonders of GScript 2.. 99.9% sure it is possible already, and willing to bet large sums *cough* over $1000 *cough* that I could replicate such.

Nope. Unless you scripted your own PMs, which is pretty much cheating.

Well, that or if you were really lazy I guess you could make the server pm the staff member for you..

besides.. it's not cheating at all.. just time consuming.

It's "cheating" because it's not using PMs and therefore not accomplishing the goal of this thread. Also, I'd never use a PM system except the default due to the possibility of staff logging of PMs.

I agree with this, i think it could be a good way for trials to communicate with staff to ask questions and therefore maybe even buy a subscription if they like the game enough

I actually disagree.
60 seconds limit is there for the trial "hey you need to upgrade" pressure. It would make it easier, but it's also there to push them towards upgrading.

Or push them away from the game entirely...

I think someone is way more likely to upgrade if they're able to communicate with staff members about the game than if they get a message saying "Whoops, you're ****ed!" when they try to ask an FAQ how they're supposed to play.

That's also true, but there could be other stupid limitation that could be removed such as observer mode if they want to keep future customers.

The problem there isn't the 60-second limit, but rather the fact that people need to ask a FAQ how to play.