Graal Bomy Lands

camelback · #1 06-01-2006, 09:46 PM

I would really like to know. Are we saying good-bye to Graal Bomy Lands (Graal 2001). I dont really want to see it go just because I think the server has potential. If it has to be it has to be then I would say /wave Graal2001.

konidias · #2 06-01-2006, 10:13 PM

Yes. Only my Bomy Island project is being developed now.

Skyld · #3 06-02-2006, 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by konidias

Yes. Only my Bomy Island project is being developed now.

Can you briefly sum up the differences between the two projects?

GryffonDurime · #4 06-02-2006, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skyld

Can you briefly sum up the differences between the two projects?

Bomy Lands was a revision using most of Graal2001's current content in conjunction with newly formed updates and new kingdoms. This developed essentially to be a continuation of Graal2001.

Bomy Island is a complete rehaul including a new tileset and scripting changes to basically recreate 2k1. It's basically a retcon.

KuJi · #5 06-03-2006, 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GryffonDurime

Bomy Lands was a revision using most of Graal2001's current content in conjunction with newly formed updates and new kingdoms. This developed essentially to be a continuation of Graal2001.

Bomy Island is a complete rehaul including a new tileset and scripting changes to basically recreate 2k1. It's basically a retcon.

As in.. it's like were starting up as 'noobies' again

camelback · #6 06-25-2006, 05:05 PM

I really would like to see Graal2001 populate up and go on with how it was originally intended. Id be willing to run the server

KuJi · #7 06-25-2006, 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by camelback

I really would like to see Graal2001 populate up and go on with how it was originally intended. Id be willing to run the server

And I'd follow you.

Let's go up to stefan and beg for the original comment *Takes out torches*

konidias · #8 06-25-2006, 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by camelback

I really would like to see Graal2001 populate up and go on with how it was originally intended. Id be willing to run the server

How exactly do you feel it was "originally intended"? Only the people who managed or developed the server know how it was intended to be.

GryffonDurime · #9 06-25-2006, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by konidias

How exactly do you feel it was "originally intended"? Only the people who managed or developed the server know how it was intended to be.

Camelback's always been powerhungry. Just assume anything he says is probably an empty idea he thinks will secure him some power.

haunter · #10 06-25-2006, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by camelback

Id be willing to run the server

I'm sure you would.

Warcaptain · #11 06-26-2006, 04:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by konidias

How exactly do you feel it was "originally intended"? Only the people who managed or developed the server know how it was intended to be.

Unfortunately that does not include you x-x

konidias · #12 06-26-2006, 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warcaptain

Unfortunately that does not include you x-x

I think you need to take a trip down memory lane.

camelback · #13 06-26-2006, 05:30 PM

Gryffon's an idiot. Im not looking for what he calls "Power". Im looking to revive the server back to way it should have been. I want to put it back the way it was. Having it show the way I experienced it back in 2002 when I first played there.

konidias · #14 06-26-2006, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by camelback

Gryffon's an idiot. Im not looking for what he calls "Power". Im looking to revive the server back to way it should have been. I want to put it back the way it was. Having it show the way I experienced it back in 2002 when I first played there.

The pot calling the kettle black.

The way you experienced it on 2002 can never be brought back. NOBODY is going to play on 2k1 if it's just the same old 2k1 with nothing new and exciting.

It was exciting at that time because new things were happening and the server was incredibly popular and content was being developed and it was the year 2002. You can't revive something four years later and expect everyone to enjoy it as much as they did when it was new.

It'd be like Nintendo re-releasing the N64 with Mario 64 for full price. Who the hell would want to play it? Either you've played it to death, or you've played something better.

GryffonDurime · #15 06-26-2006, 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by camelback

Gryffon's an idiot. Im not looking for what he calls "Power". Im looking to revive the server back to way it should have been. I want to put it back the way it was. Having it show the way I experienced it back in 2002 when I first played there.

If you want to play the "I was here first, I know what's best card" I'd recommend that you check further.

People always think they want the nostalgia, but they really just want an incredible simulation.